Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?

From	Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se>
Subject	Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?
References	(12 earlier) <CAExdVNn2wM8YW=Jg=aM86X6RaaVYPTioTSJ2d1gGp0k76CN3mg@mail.gmail.com> <1442257996.253100.383441705.7A0986C7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAExdVN=s_V_uz9mSOtp6b6+fKjqLZHArXKUQ-ty5EYkLM5V2qw@mail.gmail.com> <1442260714.263025.383475777.4728D768@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1442261438.265623.383499657.4EA31AFA@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date	2015-09-15 01:23 +0200
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.578.1442272998.8327.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 16:01, Carl Meyer wrote:
>> Can we please stop cross-posting this thread to python-list and move it
>> to datetime-sig only? I think anyone here on python-list who is
>> sufficiently interested in it can subscribe to datetime-sig.
>> 
>> Or the other way around, whatever. I'd just like to stop getting all the
>> messages twice.

I don't know about the others, but I am finding this rather more
entertaining than another round of 'python -- does it have pointers'
in python-list.

Laura

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-09-15 01:23 +0200
  Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? rurpy@yahoo.com - 2015-09-14 16:38 -0700

csiph-web