Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #96611 > unrolled thread

Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-09-15 01:23 +0200
    Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? rurpy@yahoo.com - 2015-09-14 16:38 -0700

#96611 — Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 16:01, Carl Meyer wrote:
>> Can we please stop cross-posting this thread to python-list and move it
>> to datetime-sig only? I think anyone here on python-list who is
>> sufficiently interested in it can subscribe to datetime-sig.
>> 
>> Or the other way around, whatever. I'd just like to stop getting all the
>> messages twice.

I don't know about the others, but I am finding this rather more
entertaining than another round of 'python -- does it have pointers'
in python-list.

Laura

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#96612

On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 5:23:32 PM UTC-6, Laura Creighton wrote:
>[...]
> I don't know about the others, but I am finding this rather more
> entertaining than another round of 'python -- does it have pointers'
> in python-list.

Could we please dispense with the gratuitous "what I'm interested 
in is more important that what you are interested in" posts please?
Almost all mail readers have a filter ability that will address the
problem more effectively.

Thank you.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web