Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?

Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Date	2015-09-14 16:38 -0700
References	(15 earlier) <1442260714.263025.383475777.4728D768@webmail.messagingengine.com> <55F7279!> <3.1030702@oddbird.net> <1442261438.265623.383499657.4EA31AFA@webmail.messagingengine.com> <mailman.578.1442272998.8327.python-list@python.org>
Message-ID	<619ac8ff-1961-49de-9bf3-3bd515bcbb4e@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?
From	rurpy@yahoo.com

Show all headers | View raw

On Monday, September 14, 2015 at 5:23:32 PM UTC-6, Laura Creighton wrote:
>[...]
> I don't know about the others, but I am finding this rather more
> entertaining than another round of 'python -- does it have pointers'
> in python-list.

Could we please dispense with the gratuitous "what I'm interested 
in is more important that what you are interested in" posts please?
Almost all mail readers have a filter ability that will address the
problem more effectively.

Thank you.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? Laura Creighton <lac@openend.se> - 2015-09-15 01:23 +0200
  Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? rurpy@yahoo.com - 2015-09-14 16:38 -0700

csiph-web