Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #61377
| References | (1 earlier) <bghrnvFnpkpU1@mid.individual.net> <l80g93$e54$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.3717.1386476467.18130.python-list@python.org> <52a44afc$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAMjeLr_cGDRKKeg+rC9KqkPFM9xxK94ixKgT+oK1qg=QzuwB3Q@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2013-12-09 03:12 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: interactive help on the base object |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3770.1386583975.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote: > Likewise, WITH A COMPUTER, there is a definite order which can't be > countermanded by simply having this artifice called "Object". If you > FEE(L)s hadn't noticed (no longer using the insult "foo"s out of > respect for the sensativities of the brogrammers), this artifice has > just been *called on the floor* with this little innocent question > that fired up this discussion again (don't hate the messenger). > Again: people entering the community are pointing out a problem -- > that Object is both trying to be the BASE and the SUPERclass of all > objects. You're mixing two different terminologies. Whereas "superclass" contrasts with "subclass" and connotes an imaginary spatial relationship, "base" contrasts with "derived" (not "top"), which pairing does not suggest any spatial relationship at all. There is no inconsistency in that these two words happen to mean the same thing. >> Likewise it doesn't matter whether we draw class hierarchies from the top >> down or the bottom up or even sidewise: > > Have you caught it by now, friends: IT MATTERS TO THE COMPUTER. No, I'm pretty sure the computer doesn't care one whit whether the inheritance hierarchy that I scribble on a random sheet of paper happens to be represented as top-down, bottom-up, left-right, right-left, center-out, ana-kata, or using any other conceivable spatial relationship that I may have omitted. The computer only cares (inasmuch as I'm willing to personify it) about the actual *code* that I feed into it. How the programmer abstracts or visualizes that code is irrelevant.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
interactive help on the base object Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-06 17:03 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-08 13:10 +1300
Re: interactive help on the base object Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-07 19:59 -0500
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 20:21 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-08 10:33 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 15:01 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-09 05:11 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-09 05:59 -0500
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-10 03:19 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 20:32 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-10 05:10 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 21:16 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-10 00:31 -0500
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-10 06:05 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-10 01:20 -0500
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-10 09:37 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-10 03:51 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 12:04 +1000
Re: interactive help on the base object Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-12-10 04:35 -0700
Re: interactive help on the base object Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 13:44 +1100
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 19:05 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 14:17 +1100
Re: interactive help on the base object Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 03:12 -0700
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-09 15:06 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-09 12:15 +1300
Re: interactive help on the base object Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-08 07:11 -0500
csiph-web