Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.084
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.83; '*S*': 0.00; 'programmer': 0.03; 'subject:help': 0.08; 'suggest': 0.14; 'random': 0.14; 'cares': 0.16; 'hierarchy': 0.16; 'inheritance': 0.16; 'janssen': 0.16; 'likewise': 0.16; 'objects.': 0.16; 'omitted.': 0.16; 'subject:object': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '(not': 0.18; 'discussion': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; 'question': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'words': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'dec': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'community': 0.33; 'computer.': 0.33; 'actual': 0.34; 'noticed': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'no,': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'two': 0.37; 'feed': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'little': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'matter': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; "you're": 0.61; 'happen': 0.63; 'different': 0.65; 'bottom': 0.67; 'respect': 0.70; 'paper': 0.75; 'fired': 0.84; 'subject:base': 0.84; 'abstracts': 0.91; 'hate': 0.91; 'whereas': 0.91; 'sheet': 0.93; '2013': 0.98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=yokmi0sR+8Rv7CBTd16YfKTpGqDOLBMcbhoNWY7PuAA=; b=UbS2YMmNaGnkrUMpt8CkHXLmuyteZBEEDU6AIo+7DQXnFmQQXC23HhweZ09QkbHysa ZEjD0q+VsHfLNRe8WaJXKEumI30VZ7k5itcQUvnA/uv4falY2R1ruzY2bd1WEca9q0r9 zNUxV3gcvksdldLYM3cu4YvmJxs+7EtnAttoiXHMA7VOzxqH0zfLZSUJ7bZFCZSv/Bo4 XbGgickZbkLOPWc0+bHm5PdpFJndV5FJ5UYy6vwqVh3guKga5BCDWLrohIbExaU5JH4h nYY9CRAGumTaYEP7HxH4XK2JlBZKpb55vC1hMuFKWacxyAg4MzvkETT2hyzLUV0s95GK Uk1Q==
X-Received: by 10.66.221.103 with SMTP id qd7mr13462903pac.44.1386583972844; Mon, 09 Dec 2013 02:12:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMjeLr_cGDRKKeg+rC9KqkPFM9xxK94ixKgT+oK1qg=QzuwB3Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.3658.1386349412.18130.python-list@python.org> <bghrnvFnpkpU1@mid.individual.net> <l80g93$e54$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.3717.1386476467.18130.python-list@python.org> <52a44afc$0$30003$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAMjeLr_cGDRKKeg+rC9KqkPFM9xxK94ixKgT+oK1qg=QzuwB3Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 03:12:12 -0700
Subject: Re: interactive help on the base object
To: Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.3770.1386583975.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 30
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1386583975 news.xs4all.nl 2829 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56581
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:61377

On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote:
> Likewise, WITH A COMPUTER, there is a definite order which can't be
> countermanded by simply having this artifice called "Object".  If you
> FEE(L)s hadn't noticed (no longer using the insult "foo"s out of
> respect for the sensativities of the brogrammers), this artifice has
> just been *called on the floor* with this little innocent question
> that fired up this discussion again (don't hate the messenger).
> Again:  people entering the community are pointing out a problem --
> that Object is both trying to be the BASE and the SUPERclass of all
> objects.

You're mixing two different terminologies.  Whereas "superclass"
contrasts with "subclass" and connotes an imaginary spatial
relationship, "base" contrasts with "derived" (not "top"), which
pairing does not suggest any spatial relationship at all.  There is no
inconsistency in that these two words happen to mean the same thing.

>> Likewise it doesn't matter whether we draw class hierarchies from the top
>> down or the bottom up or even sidewise:
>
> Have you caught it by now, friends:  IT MATTERS TO THE COMPUTER.

No, I'm pretty sure the computer doesn't care one whit whether the
inheritance hierarchy that I scribble on a random sheet of paper
happens to be represented as top-down, bottom-up, left-right,
right-left, center-out, ana-kata, or using any other conceivable
spatial relationship that I may have omitted.  The computer only cares
(inasmuch as I'm willing to personify it) about the actual *code* that
I feed into it.  How the programmer abstracts or visualizes that code
is irrelevant.