Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #61270
| References | <mailman.3658.1386349412.18130.python-list@python.org> <bghrnvFnpkpU1@mid.individual.net> <l80g93$e54$1@ger.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-12-07 20:21 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: interactive help on the base object |
| From | Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3717.1386476467.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
>>> Is it just me, or is this basically useless? >>> >>> class object >>> | The most *base* type >> [[Terry Reedy:]] > How about something like. > The default top *superclass* for all Python classes. How 'bout you foo<l>s just admit that you didn't realize you've been confused this whole time? (It *is* possible isn't it?) Mr. Ewing says "base" has to be interpreted as an *adjective* because otherwise it would mean the BOTTOM (like the BASE of the pyramid), while Terry responds that it is the TOP (*super*class). Earlier, Steven D'Aprano wanted to argue that this distinction was irrelevant, but obviously it can't very well be both at once now cannit? Could-the-world-be-so-crazy-confused-and-then-shoot-the-messenger? Sadly, yes. MarkJ Tacoma, Washington
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
interactive help on the base object Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-06 17:03 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-08 13:10 +1300
Re: interactive help on the base object Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-07 19:59 -0500
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 20:21 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-08 10:33 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 15:01 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-09 05:11 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-09 05:59 -0500
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-10 03:19 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 20:32 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-10 05:10 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 21:16 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-10 00:31 -0500
Re: interactive help on the base object Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2013-12-10 06:05 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-12-10 01:20 -0500
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-10 09:37 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-12-10 03:51 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2013-12-11 12:04 +1000
Re: interactive help on the base object Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-12-10 04:35 -0700
Re: interactive help on the base object Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 13:44 +1100
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 19:05 -0800
Re: interactive help on the base object Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 14:17 +1100
Re: interactive help on the base object Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-12-09 03:12 -0700
Re: interactive help on the base object Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-12-09 15:06 +0000
Re: interactive help on the base object Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2013-12-09 12:15 +1300
Re: interactive help on the base object Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-12-08 07:11 -0500
csiph-web