Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15713
| From | "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.protocols.dns.bind |
| Subject | Re: DoH plugin for BIND |
| Date | 2020-05-02 12:57 -0400 |
| Organization | Taughannock Networks |
| Message-ID | <mailman.337.1588438632.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.335.1588436727.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> <20200502165717.E5F0F18A2F4E@ary.qy> |
In article <mailman.335.1588436727.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> you write: >On Sat, 2 May 2020, Michael De Roover wrote: > >> Even if your ISP allows it, chances are that other mail servers will >> reject it ... >My residential-class static IP mail server has never had problems >delivering mail. I've checked it many times over the years on many >blacklist checkers and never had anything but green lights. Your ISP is quite unusual. Count your blessings. The large cable providers in the US and Canada block outgoing port 25 on residential networks. To whoever said that MUAs still default to port 25 submission, you must use different MUAs from the rest of us. All the ones I use default to 587 and 465. R's, John PS: What deoes this have to do with BIND?
Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: DoH plugin for BIND Brett Delmage <Brett@BrettDelmage.ca> - 2020-05-02 12:25 -0400 Re: DoH plugin for BIND "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> - 2020-05-02 12:57 -0400
csiph-web