Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.protocols.dns.bind > #15711 > unrolled thread

Re: DoH plugin for BIND

Back to article view | Back to comp.protocols.dns.bind

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: DoH plugin for BIND Brett Delmage <Brett@BrettDelmage.ca> - 2020-05-02 12:25 -0400
    Re: DoH plugin for BIND "John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> - 2020-05-02 12:57 -0400

#15711 — Re: DoH plugin for BIND

On Sat, 2 May 2020, Michael De Roover wrote:

> Even if your ISP allows it, chances are that other mail servers will 
> reject it

Nope, not always.

My residential-class static IP mail server has never had problems 
delivering mail. I've checked it many times over the years on many 
blacklist checkers and never had anything but green lights.

Of course I have met all the email best practices for years: SPF, DKIM, 
reverse pointer, etc.

Even though email is not secure, I still feel better knowing that emails 
end up in MY server via opportunistic TLS transport. and not in some 
Yahoo's or surveillance capitalist's data store.

Underlying all this are my own DNSSEC-enabled BIND servers, of course.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#15713

In article <mailman.335.1588436727.942.bind-users@lists.isc.org> you write:
>On Sat, 2 May 2020, Michael De Roover wrote:
>
>> Even if your ISP allows it, chances are that other mail servers will 
>> reject it ...

>My residential-class static IP mail server has never had problems 
>delivering mail. I've checked it many times over the years on many 
>blacklist checkers and never had anything but green lights.

Your ISP is quite unusual.  Count your blessings.  The large cable
providers in the US and Canada block outgoing port 25 on residential
networks.

To whoever said that MUAs still default to port 25 submission, you
must use different MUAs from the rest of us.  All the ones I use
default to 587 and 465.

R's,
John

PS: What deoes this have to do with BIND?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.protocols.dns.bind

csiph-web