Path: csiph.com!news.uzoreto.com!news.etla.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!usenet-its.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!not-for-mail From: "John Levine" Newsgroups: comp.protocols.dns.bind Subject: Re: DoH plugin for BIND Date: 2 May 2020 12:57:17 -0400 Organization: Taughannock Networks Lines: 22 Approved: bind-users@lists.isc.org Message-ID: References: <20200502165717.E5F0F18A2F4E@ary.qy> NNTP-Posting-Host: lists.isc.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: usenet.stanford.edu 1588438645 32018 149.20.1.60 (2 May 2020 16:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: action@cs.stanford.edu To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Delivered-To: bind-users@lists.isc.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=a142.5eada66e.k2005; bh=6RrvPwzsL7/fKH1Scc/FKFDpBZwYbhgmpKQZAeLa9vM=; b=MH7J4C2a28zlu0Tkl5TceyuGJKULSm/zXgicNtZAJOffWXSP6t7hofDAiJjh3brRX1Hlw5rlgxptwAg7znF8Frx2YCoCcw3hGT17WD6Jpas4lxX8lUDg5qeiGsaDeMm25Imd7o772MHQ8HbOytmYmftzA1gkz11qvtO1WrXu+KGoFDG6uRTbLmvXfSnvbUWhbfQYRizafNDS68I0ZkLyyP9xBRgOKlNX6zwysbE3vwcvSElMqYLcLGVhGeRw+1gN In-Reply-To: X-Headerized: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mx.pao1.isc.org X-BeenThere: bind-users@lists.isc.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: BIND Users Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: <20200502165717.E5F0F18A2F4E@ary.qy> Xref: csiph.com comp.protocols.dns.bind:15713 In article you write: >On Sat, 2 May 2020, Michael De Roover wrote: > >> Even if your ISP allows it, chances are that other mail servers will >> reject it ... >My residential-class static IP mail server has never had problems >delivering mail. I've checked it many times over the years on many >blacklist checkers and never had anything but green lights. Your ISP is quite unusual. Count your blessings. The large cable providers in the US and Canada block outgoing port 25 on residential networks. To whoever said that MUAs still default to port 25 submission, you must use different MUAs from the rest of us. All the ones I use default to 587 and 465. R's, John PS: What deoes this have to do with BIND?