Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #24750
| Date | 2012-07-01 21:36 +0200 |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> |
| Subject | Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? |
| References | <339f28b0-1305-43b9-b2b1-02e332bc80e3@q29g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <CAGGBd_rptutPaYt4XQyQay3uXYvC-6u2Jzdc7au4mPGQnmkYyg@mail.gmail.com> <4FF09DE3.9020808@jollybox.de> <CAGGBd_ooxi3DGSBczUnzbY5U8hxGyDrJRH+j-Xwm6vH3UjF-uw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1691.1341171387.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 07/01/2012 09:28 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de > <mailto:t@jollybox.de>> wrote: > > On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library. > > > Beg pardon? > > https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/External.LCA_RESTRICTED/Languages/IronPython/27/Lib > > Perhaps things have changed. > > When I last checked the situation, IronPython came with no standard > library, but you could bolt one on that hadn't been tested well - IIRC, > just a simple "import os" gave a traceback. FePy was IronPython with a > standard library and some degree of testing, but their emphasis was > windows-only. > > I'd be open to using FePy instead, and I might even call it IronPython, > but I'm not in the habit of happily using software that is Windows only. > That must have been quite a while ago? I haven't tested it recently, but I'm fairly sure that IronPython includes a Python standard library which works reasonably well, and it's not Windows-only. (it works with Mono)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? dmitrey <dmitrey15@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 10:51 -0700
Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 20:53 +0200
Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2012-07-01 16:03 -0400
Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 20:58 +0200
Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 14:09 -0500
Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 21:36 +0200
Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-07-02 10:51 -0700
Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2012-07-03 20:16 -0700
Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-07-02 20:37 +0200
csiph-web