Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #24750

Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last?

Date 2012-07-01 21:36 +0200
From Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de>
Subject Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last?
References <339f28b0-1305-43b9-b2b1-02e332bc80e3@q29g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <CAGGBd_rptutPaYt4XQyQay3uXYvC-6u2Jzdc7au4mPGQnmkYyg@mail.gmail.com> <4FF09DE3.9020808@jollybox.de> <CAGGBd_ooxi3DGSBczUnzbY5U8hxGyDrJRH+j-Xwm6vH3UjF-uw@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1691.1341171387.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/01/2012 09:28 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de
> <mailto:t@jollybox.de>> wrote:
> 
>     On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>     > IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library.
> 
> 
>     Beg pardon?
> 
>     https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/External.LCA_RESTRICTED/Languages/IronPython/27/Lib
> 
> Perhaps things have changed.
> 
> When I last checked the situation, IronPython came with no standard
> library, but you could bolt one on that hadn't been tested well - IIRC,
> just a simple "import os" gave a traceback.  FePy was IronPython with a
> standard library and some degree of testing, but their emphasis was
> windows-only.
> 
> I'd be open to using FePy instead, and I might even call it IronPython,
> but I'm not in the habit of happily using software that is Windows only.
> 

That must have been quite a while ago?

I haven't tested it recently, but I'm fairly sure that IronPython
includes a Python standard library which works reasonably well, and it's
not Windows-only. (it works with Mono)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? dmitrey <dmitrey15@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 10:51 -0700
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 20:53 +0200
    Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2012-07-01 16:03 -0400
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 20:58 +0200
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 14:09 -0500
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 21:36 +0200
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-07-02 10:51 -0700
    Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2012-07-03 20:16 -0700
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-07-02 20:37 +0200

csiph-web