Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.021 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'testing,': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; '(it': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'library': 0.15; '"import': 0.16; 'happily': 0.16; 'ironpython': 0.16; 'reasonably': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.50': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'traceback.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'library,': 0.17; 'windows': 0.19; 'fairly': 0.21; 'subject:will': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; "haven't": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'library.': 0.27; 'changed.': 0.29; 'dan': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'subject:last': 0.30; 'checked': 0.30; 'could': 0.32; 'instead,': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'open': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'subject:" ': 0.36; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'degree': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'received:62': 0.62; 'thomas': 0.62; 'gave': 0.65; 'jul': 0.65; 'url:main': 0.65; 'from:addr:t': 0.84; 'received:62.75': 0.84; 'url:27': 0.84; 'url:master': 0.84; 'habit': 0.91 Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:36:25 +0200 From: Thomas Jollans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? References: <339f28b0-1305-43b9-b2b1-02e332bc80e3@q29g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <4FF09DE3.9020808@jollybox.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 31 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1341171387 news.xs4all.nl 6945 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54863 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:24750 On 07/01/2012 09:28 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Jollans > wrote: > > On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote: > > IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library. > > > Beg pardon? > > https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/External.LCA_RESTRICTED/Languages/IronPython/27/Lib > > Perhaps things have changed. > > When I last checked the situation, IronPython came with no standard > library, but you could bolt one on that hadn't been tested well - IIRC, > just a simple "import os" gave a traceback. FePy was IronPython with a > standard library and some degree of testing, but their emphasis was > windows-only. > > I'd be open to using FePy instead, and I might even call it IronPython, > but I'm not in the habit of happily using software that is Windows only. > That must have been quite a while ago? I haven't tested it recently, but I'm fairly sure that IronPython includes a Python standard library which works reasonably well, and it's not Windows-only. (it works with Mono)