Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #24750

Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <t@jollybox.de>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.021
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; 'testing,': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; '(it': 0.09; 'url:github': 0.09; 'library': 0.15; '"import': 0.16; 'happily': 0.16; 'ironpython': 0.16; 'reasonably': 0.16; 'received:192.168.1.50': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:when': 0.16; 'traceback.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'library,': 0.17; 'windows': 0.19; 'fairly': 0.21; 'subject:will': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; "haven't": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'library.': 0.27; 'changed.': 0.29; 'dan': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'subject:last': 0.30; 'checked': 0.30; 'could': 0.32; 'instead,': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'open': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'subject:" ': 0.36; 'quite': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'degree': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'things': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'received:62': 0.62; 'thomas': 0.62; 'gave': 0.65; 'jul': 0.65; 'url:main': 0.65; 'from:addr:t': 0.84; 'received:62.75': 0.84; 'url:27': 0.84; 'url:master': 0.84; 'habit': 0.91
Date Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:36:25 +0200
From Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de>
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version 1.0
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last?
References <339f28b0-1305-43b9-b2b1-02e332bc80e3@q29g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <CAGGBd_rptutPaYt4XQyQay3uXYvC-6u2Jzdc7au4mPGQnmkYyg@mail.gmail.com> <4FF09DE3.9020808@jollybox.de> <CAGGBd_ooxi3DGSBczUnzbY5U8hxGyDrJRH+j-Xwm6vH3UjF-uw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To <CAGGBd_ooxi3DGSBczUnzbY5U8hxGyDrJRH+j-Xwm6vH3UjF-uw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1691.1341171387.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 31
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1341171387 news.xs4all.nl 6945 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54863
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:24750

Show key headers only | View raw

On 07/01/2012 09:28 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de
> <mailto:t@jollybox.de>> wrote:
> 
>     On 07/01/2012 08:44 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
>     > IronPython, sadly, lacks a python standard library.
> 
> 
>     Beg pardon?
> 
>     https://github.com/IronLanguages/main/tree/master/External.LCA_RESTRICTED/Languages/IronPython/27/Lib
> 
> Perhaps things have changed.
> 
> When I last checked the situation, IronPython came with no standard
> library, but you could bolt one on that hadn't been tested well - IIRC,
> just a simple "import os" gave a traceback.  FePy was IronPython with a
> standard library and some degree of testing, but their emphasis was
> windows-only.
> 
> I'd be open to using FePy instead, and I might even call it IronPython,
> but I'm not in the habit of happily using software that is Windows only.
> 

That must have been quite a while ago?

I haven't tested it recently, but I'm fairly sure that IronPython
includes a Python standard library which works reasonably well, and it's
not Windows-only. (it works with Mono)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? dmitrey <dmitrey15@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 10:51 -0700
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 20:53 +0200
    Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Ross Ridge <rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> - 2012-07-01 16:03 -0400
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 20:58 +0200
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-07-01 14:09 -0500
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-07-01 21:36 +0200
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? John Nagle <nagle@animats.com> - 2012-07-02 10:51 -0700
    Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2012-07-03 20:16 -0700
  Re: when "normal" parallel computations in CPython will be implemented at last? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-07-02 20:37 +0200

csiph-web