Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download

From	Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Subject	Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download
Date	2013-08-23 19:24 +1000
References	(1 earlier) <CAPTjJmoCwWk_n-rsxy9gJfJakcnoD8=9p6uFduSJALHzGs5n_A@mail.gmail.com> <7wppt5mb3z.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <CAPTjJmqM9htrXCX41aBebJ2FE1OFiqTfRBk-n74kDFLFUvSVMA@mail.gmail.com> <7wvc2xkjvz.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <nad-A39EE3.01142923082013@news.gmane.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.157.1377249885.19984.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> writes:

> In article <7wvc2xkjvz.fsf@benfinney.id.au>,
>  Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes:
> > > Hence the question: How many people actually do use the downloaded
> > > docs? Maybe it'd turn out to be quite high, but it's not an
> > > unreasonable question.
> > 
> > I think it's an unreasonable question [in this context].

> In any case if you want to see this happen, someone needs to open an 
> issue and make a case for it on the Python bug tracker.

Neither Chris nor I are proposing to have PEPs in the installed
documentation :-) You might want to respond directly to the original
post with that suggestion.

-- 
 \     “Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do |
  `\        it from religious conviction.” —Blaise Pascal (1623–1662), |
_o__)                                                   Pensées, #894. |
Ben Finney

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-20 22:14 -0700
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 03:32 +1000
    Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 01:39 -0700
      Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-22 18:46 -0400
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download random832@fastmail.us - 2013-08-21 13:55 -0400
    Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 01:45 -0700
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-21 14:15 -0400
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download random832@fastmail.us - 2013-08-21 14:28 -0400
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 04:50 +1000
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-21 16:15 -0400
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-08-21 20:27 -0400
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 11:47 +1000
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-23 11:54 +1000
    Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-08-23 13:19 +0000
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 16:21 +1000
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2013-08-23 01:14 -0700
  Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 19:24 +1000

csiph-web