Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #52857
| References | <4bc4d258-1e12-4e1a-af9c-0019f099612f@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmoCwWk_n-rsxy9gJfJakcnoD8=9p6uFduSJALHzGs5n_A@mail.gmail.com> <7wppt5mb3z.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-08-23 11:54 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.149.1377222934.19984.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes: > >> Also, how many people actually depend on the downloadable >> documentation, rather than simply reading things online? > > Many countries do not have infrastructure that allows reliable, fast, > low-latency internet access 24-hours-a-day. Most countries's internet > infrastructure, in fact, does not satisfy all of those. I'm aware of that. However, I'm also aware that many people still read things online, even with a less-than-reliable internet connection. Hence the question: How many people actually do use the downloaded docs? Maybe it'd turn out to be quite high, but it's not an unreasonable question. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-20 22:14 -0700
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 03:32 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 01:39 -0700
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-22 18:46 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download random832@fastmail.us - 2013-08-21 13:55 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 01:45 -0700
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-21 14:15 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download random832@fastmail.us - 2013-08-21 14:28 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 04:50 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-21 16:15 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-08-21 20:27 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 11:47 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-23 11:54 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-08-23 13:19 +0000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 16:21 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2013-08-23 01:14 -0700
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 19:24 +1000
csiph-web