Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #52870
| From | Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download |
| Date | 2013-08-23 01:14 -0700 |
| References | <4bc4d258-1e12-4e1a-af9c-0019f099612f@googlegroups.com> <CAPTjJmoCwWk_n-rsxy9gJfJakcnoD8=9p6uFduSJALHzGs5n_A@mail.gmail.com> <7wppt5mb3z.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <CAPTjJmqM9htrXCX41aBebJ2FE1OFiqTfRBk-n74kDFLFUvSVMA@mail.gmail.com> <7wvc2xkjvz.fsf@benfinney.id.au> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.154.1377245681.19984.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
In article <7wvc2xkjvz.fsf@benfinney.id.au>, Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes: > > Hence the question: How many people actually do use the downloaded > > docs? Maybe it'd turn out to be quite high, but it's not an > > unreasonable question. > > I think it's an unreasonable question. What would you accept as an > answer? Who could possibly be autoritative at estimating such a number? > How would you choose between competing authorities and estimates? > > It should be sufficient to realise that the reality of internet > infrastructure in most countries makes it preferable – at least some of > the time, for some significant, even if small, number of users – to read > the documentation on local storage instead of on the internet. In any case if you want to see this happen, someone needs to open an issue and make a case for it on the Python bug tracker. -- Ned Deily, nad@acm.org
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-20 22:14 -0700
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 03:32 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 01:39 -0700
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-22 18:46 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download random832@fastmail.us - 2013-08-21 13:55 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Aseem Bansal <asmbansal2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 01:45 -0700
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Jerry Hill <malaclypse2@gmail.com> - 2013-08-21 14:15 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download random832@fastmail.us - 2013-08-21 14:28 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-22 04:50 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-08-21 16:15 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-08-21 20:27 -0400
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 11:47 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-08-23 11:54 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-08-23 13:19 +0000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 16:21 +1000
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ned Deily <nad@acm.org> - 2013-08-23 01:14 -0700
Re: PEPs should be included with the documentation download Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-23 19:24 +1000
csiph-web