Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91399
| Date | 2015-05-28 16:16 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. |
| References | <3794b$55678d83$5419aafe$56138@news.ziggo.nl> <67de616e-5af7-417d-88a9-db1c665df473@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.143.1432851416.5151.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 05/28/2015 03:58 PM, sohcahtoa82@gmail.com wrote: > I think the logic you're really looking for is: > > return BotWaitForCooldown or (not (BotWaitForCooldown or CooldownDetected)) Yes this is the simplest form. For more complicated truth tables you can create a K map and then apply a reduction algorithm to it. This is commonly done in logic circuits to reduce the number of gates to the minimum. While not faster, it can be expressed as: return BotWaitForCooldown or not BotWaitForCooldown and not CooldownDectected Order of operations puts the ands above the ors.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:50 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:55 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:07 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:08 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:12 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:45 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:56 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:13 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:15 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 14:58 -0700
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 16:16 -0600
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:54 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 23:03 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 18:52 -0600
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 17:15 -0700
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:25 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:46 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:01 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:11 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-05-28 17:02 -0500
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2015-05-29 01:13 +0300
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-05-28 18:39 -0400
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-28 23:56 +0100
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-05-28 19:21 -0400
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2015-05-29 19:07 -0400
csiph-web