Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #91405

Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table.

Show all headers | View raw

On 28/05/2015 23:39, Lew Pitcher wrote:
> On Thursday May 28 2015 17:50, in comp.lang.c, "Skybuck Flying"
> <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was just coding and ran into a little logic problem which is as follows:
>>
>> There are two booleans/variables which can be either false or true.
>>
>> The desired thrutle table is:
>>
>> A = input
>> B = input
>> C = output
>>
>> A B C:
>> -------
>> F F T
>> F T F
>> T F T
>> T T T
>
> Seems simple enough: C == A || !B
>
> 18:38 $ cat testlogic.c
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
> /*
> ** A = input
> ** B = input
> ** C = output
> **
> ** A B C:
> ** -------
> ** F F T
> ** F T F
> ** T F T
> ** T T T
> */
>
> int testlogic(int a, int b)
> {
>    return (a || !b);
> }
>
> int main(void)
> {
>                        /* A B C */
>    int ttable[4][3] = {  {0,0,1},        /* F F T */
>                          {0,1,0},        /* F T F */
>                          {1,0,1},        /* T F T */
>                          {1,1,1}         /* T T T */
>                       };
>    int rc = EXIT_SUCCESS;
>    int i, max;
>
>    for (i = 0, max = sizeof(ttable) / sizeof(ttable[0]); i < max ; ++i)
>      if (testlogic(ttable[i][0],ttable[i][1]) != ttable[i][2])
>      {
>        printf("testlogic failed on test %d\n",i);
>        rc = EXIT_FAILURE;
>      }
>
>    if (rc == EXIT_SUCCESS) puts("SUCCESS");
>
>    return rc;
> }
> 18:39 $ cc -o testlogic testlogic.c
> 18:39 $ ./testlogic
> SUCCESS
>
>

Strangest looking Python I've ever seen.  Or is it a case of "Get thee 
behind me, Satan" :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:50 +0200
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:55 +0200
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:07 +0200
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:08 +0200
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:12 +0200
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:45 +0200
            Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:56 +0200
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:13 +0000
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:15 +0000
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 14:58 -0700
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 16:16 -0600
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:54 +0000
        Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 23:03 +0000
          Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 18:52 -0600
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 17:15 -0700
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:25 +0000
      Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:46 +0200
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:01 +0000
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:11 +0000
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-05-28 17:02 -0500
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2015-05-29 01:13 +0300
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-05-28 18:39 -0400
    Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-28 23:56 +0100
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-05-28 19:21 -0400
  Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2015-05-29 19:07 -0400

csiph-web