Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91389
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi, alt.comp.lang.c, att.lang.c++, comp.lang.c, comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. |
| Date | 2015-05-28 22:01 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <mk8376$2qq$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <3794b$55678d83$5419aafe$56138@news.ziggo.nl> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 2015-05-28, Skybuck Flying <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I tried logic below... but funny enough it failed, now I feel like a
> noob lol and share this funny little fail logic with you.
>
> Can you improve/fix the logic ?
> # while DesiredResult==True:
> # Desired truth table for BotWaitForCooldown and CooldownDetected
> # BotWaitForCooldown: CooldownDetected: Desired Result:
> # False False True
> # False True False
> # True False True
> # True True True
> # desired/suiting logic:
> # (BotWaitForCooldown or ((not BotWaitForCooldown) and CooldownDetected))
I don't see why you think that's the desired logic, since it doesn't
match your truth table or your test.
> def TestLogic( BotWaitForCooldown, CooldownDetected ):
> return BotWaitForCooldown or ((not BotWaitForCooldown) and CooldownDetected)
> # this logic is flawed, please improve logic.
def TestLogic( BotWaitForCooldown, CooldownDetected ):
return not ((not BotWaitForCooldown) and CooldownDetected)
works for me...
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Alright, you!!
at Imitate a WOUNDED SEAL
gmail.com pleading for a PARKING
SPACE!!
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:50 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:55 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:07 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:08 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 00:12 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:45 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:56 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:13 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. (thruth table to logic/boolean operations generator sought/needed) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:15 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 14:58 -0700
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 16:16 -0600
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:54 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 23:03 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 18:52 -0600
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-05-28 17:15 -0700
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-05-28 23:25 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. "Skybuck Flying" <skybuck2000@hotmail.com> - 2015-05-29 04:46 +0200
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:01 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-28 22:11 +0000
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2015-05-28 17:02 -0500
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2015-05-29 01:13 +0300
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2015-05-28 18:39 -0400
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-28 23:56 +0100
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. Paul <nospam@needed.com> - 2015-05-28 19:21 -0400
Re: Logic problem: need better logic for desired thruth table. M Philbrook <jamie_ka1lpa@charter.net> - 2015-05-29 19:07 -0400
csiph-web