Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74061
| Date | 2014-07-06 23:49 +0100 |
|---|---|
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
| Subject | Re: Question about metacharacter '*' |
| References | <1404668474.56075.BPMail_high_noncarrier@web163802.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11563.1404686967.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2014-07-06 18:41, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote: > > > >>In article <d8f8d76d-0a47-4f59-8f09-da2a44cc1d2e@googlegroups.com>, >> Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> As an aside i prefer to only utilize a "character set" when >>> nothing else will suffice. And in this case r"[0-9][0-9]*" >>> can be expressed just as correctly (and less noisy IMHO) as >>> r"\d\d*". >> >>Even better, r"\d+" > > I tend tot do that too, even though technically the two are not perfectly equivalent. With the re.LOCALE flag LC_ctype is also affected, which affects what is captured by \d but not by [0-9] > \d also matches more than just [0-9] in Unicode.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Question about metacharacter '*' MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-07-06 23:49 +0100
csiph-web