Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #74061

Re: Question about metacharacter '*'

Date 2014-07-06 23:49 +0100
From MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
Subject Re: Question about metacharacter '*'
References <1404668474.56075.BPMail_high_noncarrier@web163802.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.11563.1404686967.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 2014-07-06 18:41, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:
>
>
>
>>In article <d8f8d76d-0a47-4f59-8f09-da2a44cc1d2e@googlegroups.com>,
>> Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> As an aside i prefer to only utilize a "character set" when
>>> nothing else will suffice. And in this case r"[0-9][0-9]*"
>>> can be expressed just as correctly  (and less noisy IMHO) as
>>> r"\d\d*".
>>
>>Even better, r"\d+"
>
> I tend tot do that too, even though technically the two are not perfectly equivalent. With the re.LOCALE flag LC_ctype is also affected, which affects what is captured by \d but not by [0-9]
>
\d also matches more than just [0-9] in Unicode.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Question about metacharacter '*' MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-07-06 23:49 +0100

csiph-web