Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #74061 > unrolled thread
| Started by | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-07-06 23:49 +0100 |
| Last post | 2014-07-06 23:49 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Question about metacharacter '*' MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2014-07-06 23:49 +0100
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-07-06 23:49 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Question about metacharacter '*' |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11563.1404686967.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 2014-07-06 18:41, Albert-Jan Roskam wrote: > > > >>In article <d8f8d76d-0a47-4f59-8f09-da2a44cc1d2e@googlegroups.com>, >> Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> As an aside i prefer to only utilize a "character set" when >>> nothing else will suffice. And in this case r"[0-9][0-9]*" >>> can be expressed just as correctly (and less noisy IMHO) as >>> r"\d\d*". >> >>Even better, r"\d+" > > I tend tot do that too, even though technically the two are not perfectly equivalent. With the re.LOCALE flag LC_ctype is also affected, which affects what is captured by \d but not by [0-9] > \d also matches more than just [0-9] in Unicode.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web