Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #662600

Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia'

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Le 10/04/2025 à 11:42, Ross Clark a écrit :
> On 10/04/2025 8:22 p.m., Bertitaylor wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 5:51:50 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
>>
>>> Am Dienstag000008, 08.04.2025 um 07:28 schrieb Bertitaylor:
>>>> Newton getting forgers hanged led to the establishment of modern
>>>> finance. Previous metals have got represented by intrinsically 
>>>> worthless
>>>> paper or plastic and now some twists on cyberspace. Which means immense
>>>> and everlasting prosperity for everyone. The only way this was possible
>>>> was to make copying impossible or very difficult.
>>>>
>>>> Sir Isaac Newton knew this would happen. Adam Smith's ideal notion that
>>>> money is labour and vice versa got its practical realisation with the
>>>> goal of impossibility of forgery. That is, difficulty in 
>>>> counterfeiting.
>>>> Which was what Newton was up to. No longer would people have to lug 
>>>> gold
>>>> and silver around. Those who work have their ability to do so as their
>>>> wealth. So in a free and open society all healthy and cheerful folk are
>>>> naturally wealthy.
>>>>
>>>> Undoubtedly Sir Isaac Newton was the greatest benefactor of humanity.
>>>
>>> As far as I know, Newton was an alchemist and tried to create gold from
>>> other metals.
>>
>> Alchemy was very useful as the ancestor of chemistry. Getting gold out
>> of base metal was a goal for all alchemists. Not just Newton.
>>>
>>> So, in a way he was a forger himself.
>>
>> Wrong. He just had no idea about modern chemistry. Just as he had no
>> idea about electricity. He was employing his scientific attitude to
>> materials.
>>
>>> But I also have heard, that Newton was actually 'fabricated' himself
>>> (similar to Shakespeare).
>>
>> Again wrong. Both Newton and Shakespeare were very well known to the
>> elites of their time.
>>
>> Unlike Arindam who is never mentioned in the media, thus is
>> comprehensively suppressed, prior to his getting robbed of his IP;
>> following their racist/reverse-racist and bigoted/bootlicking robber
>> imperatives.
>>
>> Woof woof woof-woof woof
> 
> Internet Profile?
> Intimate Parts??!?

Good question. I'm intrigued by 'previous metals'.

Still it's good that Bertie is doggedly studying English.

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-08 05:28 +0000
  Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' occam <occam@nowhere.nix> - 2025-04-08 08:33 +0200
    Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-04-08 08:37 +0000
      Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-04-08 09:50 +0000
  Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-10 07:51 +0200
    Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-10 08:22 +0000
      Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> - 2025-04-10 22:42 +1200
        Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-04-10 11:47 +0100
          Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-10 12:03 +0000
        Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-04-10 14:00 +0000
      Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' x <x@x.org> - 2025-04-10 12:11 -0700
        Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-11 03:57 +0000
          Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-12 10:29 +0200
            Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-12 13:59 +0000
              Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-13 09:15 +0200
          Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-04-13 18:15 +1000
            Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-13 08:26 +0000
            Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-04-13 10:50 +0100
              Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-04-13 20:54 +1000
                Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-04-13 13:32 +0100
            Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Chris Elvidge <chris@internal.net> - 2025-04-13 12:11 +0100
              Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> - 2025-04-13 21:28 +1000
              Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-04-14 21:01 +0200
                Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor) - 2025-04-14 21:19 +0000
                Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' "B.J./Zachar Zhen Guang" <rqb@mcc.cn> - 2025-04-15 09:28 +0000
    Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> - 2025-04-10 09:54 +0100
      Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-04-11 06:44 +0200
        Re: The Angry Man's review of Newtons 'Principia' bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertitaylor) - 2025-04-11 09:39 +0000

csiph-web