Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #660960
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Division by zero |
| Date | 2025-02-03 08:56 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m0bb5pFcl1hU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <m063e7FhjrnU1@mid.individual.net> <vnkpup$1f33$1@dont-email.me> <m08j18FtovhU1@mid.individual.net> <vnne00$kfok$1@dont-email.me> |
Am Sonntag000002, 02.02.2025 um 10:30 schrieb Mikko: >>>> Hi NG >>>> >>>> I'm actually not really certain, but found an error in Einstein's >>>> 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies' which is quite serious. >>>> >>>> >>>> See page six, roughly in the middle: >>>> >>>> There we find an equation, which says this: >>>> >>>> ∂τ/∂y= 0 >>> >>> Do you mean on page 899 (9th page of the article) in §3? >>> The operation is not division but a partial derivative. > > You should answer this question. It is not useful to talk without telling > what you are talking about. > I'm referring to the English translation, which can be found here https://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ The English pdf version has other page numbers than the original article. But in a way, these original page numbers are also possible as reference. But unfortunately I have here only the English version (the German I have on a different computer). So I have to tell you the page from the English version or make the meant part available to you by other means. So, § 3 was meant and roughly the middle, which can be found on page 6 of the English pdf version. And you are absolutely right, that a partial derivative was meant. The problem was: of which function was a partial derivative meant? I have found already, what Einstein had actually meant: Einstein didn't define the used variables and simply assumed, the reader would know anyhow, what he had in mind. But that wasn't particularly easy, because Einstein used the symbol τ for three different types of objects. a) the time values of clocks in system k were named τ b) a function τ was derived, which should serve as coordinate transformation between system K and system k c) this function take (kind of) four-vectors of K as input and spits out four-vectors in k as output, while these output vectors were also called τ. This was rather nasty, because it could lead to several errors, if you try to interpret Einstein's intentions. And I have actually fallen in one of these traps, because I had regarded τ as time-value, while actually the function τ of case b) was meant. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-01 09:14 +0100
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-01 11:36 +0200
Re: Division by zero Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 18:19 -0800
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-02 07:58 +0100
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-02 11:40 +0200
Re: Division by zero "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2025-02-03 12:27 +0100
Re: Division by zero (0, 1, infinity) Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-02-02 07:45 -0800
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-02 07:52 +0100
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-02 09:26 +0100
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-02 11:38 +0200
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-03 09:14 +0100
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-03 17:20 +0200
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-04 08:16 +0100
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-05 09:48 +0200
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-05 10:09 +0100
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-02 11:30 +0200
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-03 08:56 +0100
Re: Division by zero Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2025-02-03 10:02 +0100
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-03 11:17 +0100
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-03 11:17 +0100
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-03 17:51 +0200
Re: Division by zero Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-03 17:33 +0100
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-04 08:36 +0100
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-04 11:13 +0200
Re: Division by zero Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2025-02-04 11:58 +0100
Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-05 09:32 +0100
Re: Division by zero nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2025-02-01 23:28 +0100
Re: Division by zero Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 20:26 -0800
Re: Division by zero film.art@gmail.com (JanPB) - 2025-02-20 21:45 +0000
Re: Division by zero The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2025-02-20 21:18 -0800
csiph-web