Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #661010
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Division by zero |
| Date | 2025-02-05 10:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <m0go65F9m5nU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <vnneeo$ki0v$1@dont-email.me> <m0bc66Fcl1hU2@mid.individual.net> <vnqmr9$1av41$1@dont-email.me> <m0dt6tFpclsU1@mid.individual.net> <vnv542$2a50d$1@dont-email.me> |
Am Mittwoch000005, 05.02.2025 um 08:48 schrieb Mikko: ... >>>> This is actually not true, because Einstein wrote this: >>>> >>>> " We first define τ as a function of x', y, z, and t. ..." >>> >>> No need to revise my comment. The problem was to determine τ from x, >>> y, z, >>> and t. The variable x' is just an intermediate step in that process. >>> >>>> The meaning of x' was also not defined properly and I'm still >>>> chewing on the problem to estimate, which interpretation is actually >>>> correct. >>> >>> The definition x' was x' = x - vt, leaving no room for interpretations. >> >> If a variable x' as 'intermediate step' without a meaning would be >> introduced, then the equation is no longer a representation of the >> real world. > > Irrelevant as Einstein defined x' when introduced it. > Almost none of his variables were defined properly. But Einstein wrote actually: "If we place x'= x − vt" '...we place ...' sounds like he meant some sort of position of something, which is placed there. From the context would fit 'position of a mirror on the x-axis of K', because a mirror could be placed there. So far, so good. But: if we place a mirror there, the equation does not fit! This is so, because x is belonging to K, too, because it is a variable in Latin letters, which belong to K. From the context of x, we are able to assume, that the position of an event in K was meant with x, which has a certain x-coordinate, why x has a fixed value in K But if we subtract v*t from that x, the position x' would move, while the placed mirror shouldn't. So: what else was actually meant? TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Division by zero Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> - 2025-02-05 09:48 +0200 Re: Division by zero Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2025-02-05 10:09 +0100
csiph-web