Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #866670
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.math, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Updated crackpot index? |
| Date | 2022-12-22 09:29 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k0iiqaF4456U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <tmtets$u6qm$1@dont-email.me> <tnnr2u$1j96$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
Am 18.12.2022 um 20:53 schrieb Volney: > On 12/8/2022 2:46 PM, Volney wrote: > > Several proposed additions to John Baez's Crackpot Index. > (I have not yet decided whether to add to his excellent list or rewrite > it. For now treat these as additions) > 38. X points for stating people who agree with a theory promoted by an > expert are "worshiping" him. > Or stating "Physics is a religion/cult!" Your method is wrong to begin with, because you should not plug in, what you try to find out. Here your 'error' is, that you consider certain topics as 'crackpottery'. But before you could possibly do that, a discussion of the validity of your claim is required. For instance: here you need to discuss the question first, whether physicst build a sect or cult prior to claiming, that mentioning this is 'crackpottery'. But it is very difficult to proove impossibility and the absense of something hidden (like secret cults, for instance). Such open questions are therefore not settled by your decision to place them in such a list. And other solutions are also difficult, because secret cults are actually hidden. ... TH
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Updated crackpot index? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-18 14:53 -0500
Re: Updated crackpot index? Vitaliy Bazzoli <zvt@viavzl.oi> - 2022-12-18 20:41 +0000
Re: Updated crackpot index? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-22 09:29 +0100
Re: Updated crackpot index? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-23 02:00 -0500
Re: Updated crackpot index? Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2022-12-23 02:56 -0800
Re: Updated crackpot index? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-24 09:57 +0100
Re: Updated crackpot index? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-24 15:32 -0500
Re: Updated crackpot index? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-25 11:17 +0100
Re: Updated crackpot index? Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2022-12-26 14:10 -0500
Re: Updated crackpot index? Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-27 09:36 +0100
Re: Updated crackpot index? Thurman De palma <eaan@phapremr.an> - 2022-12-27 13:57 +0000
Re: Updated crackpot index? Emmet Robustelli <uttl@etlmms.re> - 2022-12-29 21:28 +0000
Re: Updated crackpot index? Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-09 09:04 +0000
csiph-web