Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26649
| From | Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem |
| Date | 2012-08-06 19:22 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <jvp5if$m3q$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <pan.2012.08.06.16.18.08.86000@nowhere.com> <a8acciFcukU1@mid.individual.net> <jvp25t$k8e$1@reader1.panix.com> <jvp2eb$k8e$2@reader1.panix.com> <a8aio3Ftq2U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 2012-08-06, Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> wrote:
>>>> no, I meant something else ..
>>>>
>>>> j runs through range(M, 100) and then range(0,M), and i runs through
>>>> range(N,100) and then range(0,N)
>>>
>>> In 2.x:
>>>
>>> for i in range(M,100)+range(0,M):
>>> for j in range(N,100)+range(0,N):
>>> do_something(i,j)
>>>
>>> Dunno if that still works in 3.x. I doubt it, since I think in 3.x
>>> range returns an iterator, not?
>>
>> Indeed it doesn't work in 3.x, but this does:
>>
>> from itertools import chain
>>
>> for i in chain(range(M,100),range(0,M)):
>> for j in chain(range(N,100),range(0,N)):
>> do_something(i,j)
>
> ah, that looks good - I guess it works in 2.x as well?
I don't know. Let me test that for you...
$ python
Python 2.6.8 (unknown, May 18 2012, 11:56:26)
[GCC 4.5.3] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from itertools import chain
>>> for i in chain(range(0,5),range(5,10)):
... print i
...
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
>>>
Yes, it works in 2.x as well.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! ... bleakness
at ... desolation ... plastic
gmail.com forks ...
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 17:52 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-08-06 16:03 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 19:16 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-08-07 01:27 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2012-08-06 17:07 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-08-06 09:15 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-06 17:18 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 19:14 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-06 11:11 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-06 21:02 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-07 16:32 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-07 18:42 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-09 11:46 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-09 11:39 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-14 14:08 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 18:25 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 18:29 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 21:03 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:22 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-06 12:52 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem André Malo <ndparker@gmail.com> - 2012-08-06 20:19 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-06 15:31 -0400
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-06 21:14 +0100
csiph-web