Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26721
| From | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem |
| Date | 2012-08-07 16:32 +0100 |
| Message-Id | <pan.2012.08.07.15.32.54.912000@nowhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| References | <a8a7hvF8crU1@mid.individual.net> <pan.2012.08.06.16.18.08.86000@nowhere.com> <a8acciFcukU1@mid.individual.net> <mailman.3022.1344276685.4697.python-list@python.org> <LsOdnTFsmezHDr3NnZ2dnUVZ5h6dnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Organization | Zen Internet |
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:02:33 -0700, Larry Hudson wrote: >> for i in range(N,N+100): >> for j in range(M,M+100): >> do_something(i % 100 ,j % 100) >> >> Emile > > How about... > > for i in range(100): > for j in range(100): > do_something((i + N) % 100, (j + M) % 100) Both of these approaches move the modifications to the sequence into the body of the loop. It may be preferable to iterate over the desired sequence directly. E.g. for i in ((N + ii) % 100 for ii in xrange(100)): for j in ((M + jj) % 100 for jj in xrange(100)): do_something(i, j)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 17:52 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-08-06 16:03 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 19:16 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-08-07 01:27 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2012-08-06 17:07 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-08-06 09:15 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-06 17:18 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 19:14 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-06 11:11 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-06 21:02 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-07 16:32 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-07 18:42 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-09 11:46 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-09 11:39 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-14 14:08 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 18:25 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 18:29 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 21:03 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:22 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-06 12:52 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem André Malo <ndparker@gmail.com> - 2012-08-06 20:19 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-06 15:31 -0400
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-06 21:14 +0100
csiph-web