Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26654
| References | <a8a7hvF8crU1@mid.individual.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-06 21:14 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem |
| From | Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3028.1344284069.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 6 August 2012 16:52, Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> wrote:
> consider a nested loop algorithm -
>
> for i in range(100):
> for j in range(100):
> do_something(i,j)
>
> Now, suppose I don't want to use i = 0 and j = 0 as initial values, but some
> other values i = N and j = M, and I want to iterate through all 10,000
> values in sequence - is there a neat python-like way to this? I realize I
> can do things like use a variable for k in range(10000): and then derive
> values for i and j from k, but I'm wondering if there's something less
> clunky.
For example:
for i in range(100):
for j in range(100):
do_something((i + N)%100, (j + N)%100)
Cheers,
--
Arnaud
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 17:52 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2012-08-06 16:03 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 19:16 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-08-07 01:27 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Ian Foote <ian@feete.org> - 2012-08-06 17:07 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2012-08-06 09:15 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-06 17:18 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 19:14 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-06 11:11 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Larry Hudson <orgnut@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-06 21:02 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-08-07 16:32 +0100
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-07 18:42 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-09 11:46 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-09 11:39 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-14 14:08 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 18:25 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 18:29 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Tom P <werotizy@freent.dd> - 2012-08-06 21:03 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:22 +0000
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2012-08-06 12:52 -0700
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem André Malo <ndparker@gmail.com> - 2012-08-06 20:19 +0200
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-08-06 15:31 -0400
Re: looking for a neat solution to a nested loop problem Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-08-06 21:14 +0100
csiph-web