Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.electronics > #32657
| From | Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.electronics |
| Subject | Re: I give in |
| Date | 2017-02-14 06:49 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <egeh76F856mU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <58a11f5b$0$18164$c3e8da3$a9097924@news.astraweb.com> <egcshiFs2k6U1@mid.individual.net> <58a156dc$0$58271$b1db1813$65575428@news.astraweb.com> <egd3leFtb60U1@mid.individual.net> <58a17e43$0$36016$c3e8da3$76a7c58f@news.astraweb.com> |
On 13/02/2017 8:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: > Trevor Wilson wrote: >> On 13/02/2017 5:48 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 13/02/2017 1:52 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 12/02/2017 5:24 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 12/02/2017 4:14 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>> ~misfit~ wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Once upon a time on usenet Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 11/02/2017 2:47 PM, Phil Allison wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/02/2017 1:36 PM, F Murtz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was not the greens that sold the power off but it is the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> green >>>>>>>>>>>>>> inclined existing government that is running the existing >>>>>>>>>>>>>> renewable dependent power grid now. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> SA needs to install some diesel generator plant. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ** No they don't. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They may need to build a couple of natural gas plants - the >>>>>>>>>>>> kind >>>>>>>>>>>> that use turbines and not simply boil water. Thermal >>>>>>>>>>>> efficiencies of >>>>>>>>>>>> 60% >>>>>>>>>>>> are possible with 500MW turbines. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's entirely a matter of the period during which they're >>>>>>>>>>> expected to >>>>>>>>>>> run. You don't build expensive plant that runs only hours per >>>>>>>>>>> year, >>>>>>>>>>> just to save on fuel. You build cheap plant, even though it uses >>>>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>> fuel, because you come out ahead economically. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> While the planet slowly dies... Oh well perhaps they can buy a >>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>> the money saved? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> WTF is this shite doing in aus.electronics anyway? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Mainly because there is no purely electrical news group so people >>>>>>>>> tend >>>>>>>>> to lump anything electric into one group which is a better idea >>>>>>>>> anyway >>>>>>>>> Electricity is electricity no matter how it is used >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> **Bullshit. Like most of your posts, it was just another thinly >>>>>>>> disguised attacks on those who accept the reality of global warming >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>> that humans must address the release of CO2 in order to deal with >>>>>>>> it. >>>>>>>> You are just another idiot denier and your posts are just >>>>>>>> political, >>>>>>>> rather than technical. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I cite as proof, your constant and completely erroneous claims that >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> Greens caused the problems in South Australia. You are, of course >>>>>>>> and as >>>>>>>> usual, wrong. The electricity assets sold off by the state LIBERAL >>>>>>>> government caused the problems faced by SA today. A fact you >>>>>>>> refuse to >>>>>>>> accept. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here you go off on a tangent with non electrical crap again. >>>>>> >>>>>> **You're not fooling anyone, you dumb shit. YOU started the >>>>>> thread, by >>>>>> launching an attack on the Greens, when everyone knows it was the >>>>>> Lieberal state government, by selling the SA electrical assets that >>>>>> caused the problem faced by SA today. >>>>>> >>>>>> If YOU don't want off-topic thread in aus.electronics, then YOU >>>>>> should >>>>>> not start such threads. Moreover, get your facts straight. The Greens >>>>>> have consistently fought various state governments to prevent the >>>>>> sale >>>>>> of vital electrical assets to private companies. Private companies >>>>>> are >>>>>> profit-focused. They're not particularly interested in how much >>>>>> inconvenience is caused to consumers, provided their bottom line is >>>>>> either enhanced or not negatively affected. Governments, OTOH, are >>>>>> always consumer (voter) focused. By selling vital infrastructure to >>>>>> private concerns, Lieberal and Labor governments can claim: "It ain't >>>>>> our fault." It is, of course, since the stuff should never have been >>>>>> sold in the first place. >>>>>> >>>>>> Which brings us back to the only major political party that fought >>>>>> against the sale of electrical assets - The Greens. The guys you hate >>>>>> with such venom and irrationality, are the very party that actually >>>>>> stand for the people. IE: You and me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fuck me, you are dumber than dog-shit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Keep arguing with me, if if you like. I'll bury you with facts. >>>>>> >>>>> Facts that wander off into past problems instead of the problem >>>>> that SA >>>>> has the most expensive and at the moment most unreliable power supply >>>>> which is under the governments control >>>> >>>> **Again: The power generation is partly under private control. THAT is >>>> the problem and it was set-up by the state Lieberal government that >>>> privatised parts of the network. >>> >>> it should be under the control of the government and if it is not >>> working, regardless of who caused it the government in power could and >>> should fix it. >> >> **And just how will the government do that? Take as much space as you >> require to explain the legal implications of the government breaching a >> contract with the private operator. How much will such a thing cost the >> taxpayer? > > They should just sit back and do nothing and know they will never be > blamed by Trevor because they did not do it **Ok, dickbrain, once more: * How will the government take back control of the gas-fired power plant? * What are the legal and financial ramifications of violating the contract that the Lieberal government established with the owner of the plant? * How much will the SA taxpayer have to stump up? Answer the fucking questions, you boob. > > > >> >>> >>> Or should we just leave it, sit back,do nothing and like you just say >>> the libs caused it. >> >> **_I_ don't "say" the Lieberals sold off the assets. They DID sell off >> the assets. Fuck me. You will never admit it, will you? **_I_ don't "say" the Lieberals sold off the assets. They DID sell off the assets. Fuck me. You will never admit it, will you? >> >>> >>> As far as I am concerned the ruling government has the responsibility to >>> be seen fixing it, not just sit back and blame everyone else and do >>> nothing. >> >> **Why do you think they are doing nothing? **Why do you think they are doing nothing? >> >>> They may yet do something and we can all start on the next worse >>> >>> There are companies that were going broke, moved to Victoria because of >>> costs and are now in a worse state because of power costs. >> >> **Name those companies. **Name those companies. >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Again: The Greens tried to stop the privatisation. >>>> >>>> Clear? >> >> **Clear? Do you acknowledge that the Greens tried to stop privatisation >> of electricity assets across the nation? **Clear? Do you acknowledge that the Greens tried to stop privatisation of electricity assets across the nation? -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
Back to aus.electronics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-11 13:36 +1100
Re: I give in Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 14:08 +1100
Re: I give in Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 19:47 -0800
Re: I give in Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 15:13 +1100
Re: I give in "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2017-02-12 12:15 +1300
Re: I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-12 16:14 +1100
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-12 16:25 +1100
Re: I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-12 17:24 +1100
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-13 08:26 +1100
Re: I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-13 13:52 +1100
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-13 15:50 +1100
Re: I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-13 17:48 +1100
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-13 17:52 +1100
Re: I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-13 20:36 +1100
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 06:49 +1100
Re: I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 11:51 +1100
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-14 11:57 +1100
Re: I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-14 20:30 +1100
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-15 06:34 +1100
Re: I give in F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-02-15 12:38 +1100
Re: I give in "~misfit~" <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> - 2017-02-13 00:47 +1300
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 14:58 +1100
Re: I give in Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-02-11 15:15 +1100
Re: I give in Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> - 2017-02-10 20:28 -0800
Re: I give in Trevor Wilson <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> - 2017-02-11 14:56 +1100
csiph-web