Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.theory > #109500
| From | Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: Analytic Truth-makers |
| Date | 2024-07-23 23:27 -0400 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <b969998e09a55fb3ab05b2a19fd28a36ca56ecc7@i2pn2.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <v7olj0$19f9b$1@dont-email.me> <5406ed035cafb6c47d3b89e92dac58f0b9c67fe8@i2pn2.org> <v7pprm$1iqdm$1@dont-email.me> <c6614a4ab791677959ecc8cfc21bac9ae1811678@i2pn2.org> <v7prni$1j3e7$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/23/24 11:17 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/23/2024 10:03 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/23/24 10:45 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/23/2024 9:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 7/23/24 12:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 7/23/2024 9:51 AM, Wasell wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:17:15 -0400, in article
>>>>>> <3fb77583036a3c8b0db4b77610fb4bf4214c9c23@i2pn2.org>, Richard
>>>>>> Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 7/22/24 8:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *No stupid I have never been saying anything like that* If g and
>>>>>>>> ~g is not provable in PA then g is not a truth-bearer in PA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What makes it different fron Goldbach's conjecture?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think a better example might be Goodstein's theorem [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * It is expressible in the same language as PA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * It is neither provable, nor disprovable, in PA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * We know that it is true in the standard model of arithmetic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * We know that it is false in some (necessarily non-standard) models
>>>>>> of arithmetic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * It was discovered and proved long before it was shown to be
>>>>>> undecidable in PA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only drawback is that the theorem is somewhat more complicated
>>>>>> than Goldbach's conjecture -- not a lot, but a bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodstein%27s_theorem>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am establishing a new meaning for
>>>>> {true on the basis of meaning expressed in language}
>>>>> Formerly known as {analytic truth}.
>>>>> This makes True(L,x) computable and definable.
>>>>
>>>> You may say that, but you then refuse to do the work to actually do
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that if you try to redefine the foundation, you need
>>>> to build the whole building all over again, but you just don't
>>>> understand what you need to do that.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> L is the language of a formal mathematical system.
>>>>> x is an expression of that language.
>>>>>
>>>>> When we understand that True(L,x) means that there is a finite
>>>>> sequence of truth preserving operations in L from the semantic
>>>>> meaning of x to x in L, then mathematical incompleteness is abolished.
>>>>
>>>> Except you just defined that this isn't true, as you admit that the
>>>> Goldbach conjecgture COULD be an analytic truth even if it doesn't
>>>> have a finte sequence of truth perserving operations,
>>>
>>> I redefined analytic truth to account for that. Things
>>> like the Goldbach conjecture are in the different class
>>> of currently unknowable.
>>
>> In other words, NOTHING you are talking about apply to the logic that
>> anyone else is using.
>>
>> Note, Godel's G can't be put into that category, as it is KNOWN to be
>> true in PA, because of a proof in MM
>
> You ONLY construe it to be true in PA because that is
> the answer that you memorized.
No, it is True in PA, because it is LITERALLY True by the words it uses.
>
> When you understand that true requires a sequence of
> truth preserving operations and they do not exist in
> PA then it is not true in PA.
But they DO exist in PA, I guess you just don't understand how math works.
The sequence of steps is:
Check the number 0 to see if it satisfies the PRR. Answer = No.
Check the number 1 to see if it satisfies the PRR. Answer = No.
Check the number 2 to see if it satisfies the PRR. Answer = No.
keep repeating counting up through all the Natural Numbers.
From the trick in MM, we can see that the math in PA will say no to all
of them.
Thus, after an infinite number of steps of truth preserving operations,
we reach the conclusion that NO natural numbers actually exist that meet
that PRR, just like G claimed, so it is correct.
>
> Memorizing a view and insisting that this view must
> be correct because that is what you memorized is what
> mindless robots would do.
>
And making up an idea and refusing to test it or compare it to facts,
like you do just shows that you are just an ingorant pathological lying
idiot who recklessly disregards the truth because you only beleive your
own lies.
Sorry, you are just proving you are unfit for logic. My guess is you are
going to be working out that infinite proof in Gehenna.
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 11:42 -0500
""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:18 +0200
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 15:32 -0500
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:46 +0200
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:49 +0200
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 16:42 -0500
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 00:49 +0200
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-22 20:01 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 19:11 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-22 20:17 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 19:44 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-22 21:42 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 21:12 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-22 22:56 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 23:07 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 07:30 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 09:55 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 22:57 +0200
"undecidable" / "unentscheidbar" (Was Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 23:02 +0200
Re: "undecidable" / "unentscheidbar" (Was Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 23:13 +0200
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 19:25 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 22:15 -0400
Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 14:02 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 09:58 -0500
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 22:36 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 15:43 -0500
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 22:15 -0400
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 22:44 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 22:52 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 19:18 -0500
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 22:15 -0400
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-24 22:33 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-24 15:45 -0500
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-24 23:54 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-24 23:54 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-24 19:57 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Wasell <wasell@example.com> - 2024-07-23 16:51 +0200
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 11:26 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 22:15 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 21:45 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 23:03 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 22:17 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 23:27 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 23:09 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-24 07:28 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-24 09:20 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-24 19:57 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-24 19:44 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-24 21:05 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-25 09:12 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-25 19:35 -0400
csiph-web