Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.theory > #109542
| From | olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.theory, sci.logic |
| Subject | Re: Analytic Truth-makers |
| Date | 2024-07-25 09:12 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <v7tmfs$2acgd$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <994febb86b9367c19b35fc184522efc3f562ab04@i2pn2.org> <v7r2k1$1pa7u$1@dont-email.me> <4b85633014d21d53e9494bc7dcfbdb15afc24edf@i2pn2.org> <v7s75q$1v7h9$2@dont-email.me> <ae44e1bc802585899d19c91025327122603ccf1f@i2pn2.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 7/24/2024 8:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 7/24/24 8:44 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 7/24/2024 6:57 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 7/24/24 10:20 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 7/24/2024 6:28 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 7/24/24 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/23/2024 10:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/23/24 11:17 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2024 10:03 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/24 10:45 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2024 9:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/24 12:26 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/23/2024 9:51 AM, Wasell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:17:15 -0400, in article
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <3fb77583036a3c8b0db4b77610fb4bf4214c9c23@i2pn2.org>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7/22/24 8:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *No stupid I have never been saying anything like that*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If g and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~g is not provable in PA then g is not a truth-bearer in PA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What makes it different fron Goldbach's conjecture?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think a better example might be Goodstein's theorem [1].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It is expressible in the same language as PA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It is neither provable, nor disprovable, in PA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * We know that it is true in the standard model of arithmetic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * We know that it is false in some (necessarily
>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-standard) models
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of arithmetic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * It was discovered and proved long before it was shown to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> undecidable in PA.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The only drawback is that the theorem is somewhat more
>>>>>>>>>>>>> complicated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> than Goldbach's conjecture -- not a lot, but a bit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodstein%27s_theorem>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am establishing a new meaning for
>>>>>>>>>>>> {true on the basis of meaning expressed in language}
>>>>>>>>>>>> Formerly known as {analytic truth}.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This makes True(L,x) computable and definable.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You may say that, but you then refuse to do the work to
>>>>>>>>>>> actually do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The problem is that if you try to redefine the foundation,
>>>>>>>>>>> you need to build the whole building all over again, but you
>>>>>>>>>>> just don't understand what you need to do that.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> L is the language of a formal mathematical system.
>>>>>>>>>>>> x is an expression of that language.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> When we understand that True(L,x) means that there is a finite
>>>>>>>>>>>> sequence of truth preserving operations in L from the semantic
>>>>>>>>>>>> meaning of x to x in L, then mathematical incompleteness is
>>>>>>>>>>>> abolished.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Except you just defined that this isn't true, as you admit
>>>>>>>>>>> that the Goldbach conjecgture COULD be an analytic truth even
>>>>>>>>>>> if it doesn't have a finte sequence of truth perserving
>>>>>>>>>>> operations,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I redefined analytic truth to account for that. Things
>>>>>>>>>> like the Goldbach conjecture are in the different class
>>>>>>>>>> of currently unknowable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In other words, NOTHING you are talking about apply to the
>>>>>>>>> logic that anyone else is using.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Note, Godel's G can't be put into that category, as it is KNOWN
>>>>>>>>> to be true in PA, because of a proof in MM
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You ONLY construe it to be true in PA because that is
>>>>>>>> the answer that you memorized.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, it is True in PA, because it is LITERALLY True by the words
>>>>>>> it uses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When you understand that true requires a sequence of
>>>>>>>> truth preserving operations and they do not exist in
>>>>>>>> PA then it is not true in PA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But they DO exist in PA, I guess you just don't understand how
>>>>>>> math works.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The sequence of steps is:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Check the number 0 to see if it satisfies the PRR. Answer = No.
>>>>>>> Check the number 1 to see if it satisfies the PRR. Answer = No.
>>>>>>> Check the number 2 to see if it satisfies the PRR. Answer = No.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> keep repeating counting up through all the Natural Numbers.
>>>>>>> From the trick in MM, we can see that the math in PA will say no
>>>>>>> to all of them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thus, after an infinite number of steps of truth preserving
>>>>>>> operations, we reach the conclusion that NO natural numbers
>>>>>>> actually exist that meet that PRR, just like G claimed, so it is
>>>>>>> correct.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The lack of a proof means untruth.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, lack of a proof means unknown, as you have agreed.
>>>>
>>>> If an infinite number of steps fail to show that G is
>>>> provable in PA then G is untrue in PA.
>>>
>>> But the infinte number of steps DO show that G is true in PA, because
>>> is shows that EVERY Natural Number fails to meet the requirment.
>>>
>>
>> No stupid it does not shown this.
>> An infinite number of steps fail to meet the requirement
>> of showing that G is true.
>
> Then how does that same sort of infinite sequence make Goldbach's
> conjecture true.
>
>>
>> "This sentence is not true" is indeed not true and that
>> *does not make it true* even though its assertion is satisfied.
>>
>
> So? That isn't the chain that G uses.
You already admitted that after an infinite sequence of operations
G is not satisfied in PA.
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
Back to comp.theory | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 11:42 -0500
""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:18 +0200
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 15:32 -0500
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:46 +0200
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-22 22:49 +0200
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 16:42 -0500
Re: ""self contradictory"" (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 00:49 +0200
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-22 20:01 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 19:11 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-22 20:17 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 19:44 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-22 21:42 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 21:12 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-22 22:56 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-22 23:07 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 07:30 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 09:55 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 22:57 +0200
"undecidable" / "unentscheidbar" (Was Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 23:02 +0200
Re: "undecidable" / "unentscheidbar" (Was Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 23:13 +0200
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 19:25 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 22:15 -0400
Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 14:02 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 09:58 -0500
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 22:36 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 15:43 -0500
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 22:15 -0400
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 22:44 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-23 22:52 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 19:18 -0500
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 22:15 -0400
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-24 22:33 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-24 15:45 -0500
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-24 23:54 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-07-24 23:54 +0200
Re: Gödel's Basic Logic Course at Notre Dame (Was: Analytic Truth-makers) Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-24 19:57 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Wasell <wasell@example.com> - 2024-07-23 16:51 +0200
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 11:26 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 22:15 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 21:45 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 23:03 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 22:17 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-23 23:27 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-23 23:09 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-24 07:28 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-24 09:20 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-24 19:57 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-24 19:44 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-24 21:05 -0400
Re: Analytic Truth-makers olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-07-25 09:12 -0500
Re: Analytic Truth-makers Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-07-25 19:35 -0400
csiph-web