Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742040
| Subject | Re: fast divider? |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design, comp.arch.fpga |
| References | <tuudrkd9jpmrkn4a1nna7o662701uevjmk@4ax.com> <189dc18427b8b905$12514$2031059$4006de53@news.newsgroupdirect.com> <6laorktu6oiu397vthkra4ilcdsqdtqpb0@4ax.com> <10plapt$26c7q$6@dont-email.me> |
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2026-03-21 09:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <b6ycnSn0YLzjVCP0nZ2dnZfqn_d2XUgE@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 03/20/2026 10:36 PM, Bill Sloman wrote: > On 20/03/2026 4:05 am, john larkin wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:30:01 +0000, someone >> <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> wrote: >> >>> I assume these are up-counters, so the thing overflows at all 1's. >>> Then you only have the one fast carry TPD for the MS18b overflowing >>> to all 1s when a 1 is clocked into its LSB. One whole clock period >>> to clock the 1 out of the DFF and meet the setup times for what I >>> assume is a synchronous LD and its setup for the counters. So that >>> particular timing criticality is a DFF TPD and a LD setup TSU to >>> reliably capture the register data. The LD TPD to CLK TSU for the >>> LS18b counter shouldn't be a problem. This must be very speedy logic >>> for 150MHz. Do you have a simulator that displays how much margin you >>> have on this timing, or is it just a bunch waveforms? >> >> Yes, loadable up-counter with carry chain. >> >> This would be in an FPGA, so the diagram is just a concept. The >> reality will be VHDL code. And the FPGA boys use the Wishbone >> architecture and want the counter to be 32 bits, which is OK with me. >> >> We are already doing a DDS at 250 MHz on this chip, an Efinix T20, so >> I expect we could do a divider in that ballpark. The T20 is in the >> *slow* Efinix family. >> >> I think the T20 has 18-bit fast carry chains. >> >> After the boys code this, the tools can verify timing. >> >> FPGAs are great, but there's a cultural gap between people who draw >> and people who type. > > Can't say I've noticed that, but since I can do both, and most of the > engineers I've hung out with could too, John Larkin may be projecting here. > I have a lot of interest in the Bruchla circuit as about things like transistor nets to effect things like Fourier-style analysis. The Bruchla circuit among accounts of things like integrators and differentiators, is for the middling account of dividers, that otherwise doesn't have exactly a simple ideal circuit.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-15 11:47 -0700
Re: fast divider? someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-17 22:30 +0000
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-19 10:05 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-21 16:36 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-21 07:52 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-22 03:00 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 11:39 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 16:44 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-28 14:38 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-29 15:52 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-29 08:18 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-30 16:42 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-30 08:00 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 16:35 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 02:40 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 22:30 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 08:14 -0700
Re: fast divider? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2026-03-31 10:41 -0700
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 10:57 -0700
Re: fast divider? someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-03-26 23:30 +0000
Re: fast divider? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-21 09:38 -0700
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-21 10:29 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-23 23:49 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-23 08:20 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-24 23:04 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-24 05:56 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-25 02:47 +1100
csiph-web