Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #114634
| From | Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? |
| Date | 2012-06-17 12:18 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <a45p72FlimU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (17 earlier) <jrfset$t0r$1@dont-email.me> <13lljcgstqmfg$.8cswhlcixrn7.dlg@40tude.net> <a41gddFrd0U1@mid.individual.net> <jrg9hc$ha6$1@dont-email.me> <4fsjdvy29f.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> |
On 06/16/2012 12:33 PM, Hadron wrote: > Chris Ahlstrom<ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> writes: > >> After swilling some grog, Ian Hilliard belched this bit o' wisdom: >> >>> On 06/15/2012 08:58 PM, Foster wrote: >>>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:46:56 -0400, DFS wrote: >>>>> >>>>> And so on and so on. >>>> >>>> Ian will be running for cover again.... >>>> >>>> He's probably a janitor at Siemens. >>> >>> Oh look! It's the DFS and Foster idiot tag team. >> >> Exactly. >> >>> I never worked in those divisions. I don't care what they used. >>> >>> As for my job. I'm a System Architect and Project Manager. My job is all >>> about collecting requirements and ensuring that we come up with the best >>> solution. The operating system to be used can never be a requirements, >>> as this will force the creation of a suboptimal solution. If some of the >>> requirements are low cost and reliability, as is common for embedded >>> systems, then Windows is not an option. >>> >>> I don't know why I am trying to explain good engineering to idiots that >>> wouldn't know good engineering if it came up and hit them in the face. >> >> You do know why... nobody likes someone telling them they're wrong, even >> if that someone is a stinking idiot. It takes surprisingly long to >> come to the point where you can completely ignore their puerile >> bullshit about you. > > So, you're backin up Hilliard when he lies about Windows not being used? > > You really are a dick at times. > Windows CANNOT be legally used for any system that is safety certified as the Windows EULA explicitly states that it is not to be used for safety critical applications. You appear to be a dick at ALL times. Ian
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-14 21:36 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-14 15:02 -0500
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-14 18:46 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-14 18:44 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-15 08:36 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-15 13:51 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-15 18:37 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-15 13:46 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-15 14:58 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-15 21:23 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-15 15:30 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-15 17:31 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-15 17:33 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-16 00:12 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-15 18:20 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-15 18:25 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-16 07:26 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-16 12:33 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-17 12:18 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-06-17 08:28 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-17 12:23 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-17 18:58 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-18 00:30 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-18 22:14 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-19 08:50 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 11:45 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-18 22:17 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 11:43 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-18 07:53 -0500
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-06-18 09:43 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2012-06-18 17:44 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-18 22:20 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Bjørn Steensrud <bjornst@skogkatt.homelinux.org> - 2012-06-19 09:51 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Ian Hilliard <nospam@nospam.org> - 2012-06-15 21:15 +0200
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-06-15 07:48 -0500
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-15 08:59 -0400
Re: Ok, why is Ubuntu not updating? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-06-15 08:26 -0700
csiph-web