Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > linux.debian.vote > #5713

Re: Q: Technical Visions

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 11:25:53AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> [03/Apr 11:58pm +0530] wrote:
> > On 3 April 2026 2:48:57 pm IST, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> wrote:
> >>Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> [01/Apr 11:15pm +02] wrote:
> >>> Debian is definitely a technical project with strong social and
> >>> political aspects. But I believe that DPL is a social and political
> >>> position. If a DPL decides to drive the technical aspects of Debian
> >>> based on their personal beliefs, it will be against our do-o-cracy
> >>> culture. Will it be good as a DPL if I say Debian "should" or "should
> >>> not" comply to "age verification requirement" without any discussion? I
> >>> plan to stand by the decisions the project takes.
> >>>
> >>>  From whatever I have observed in recent DPL tenures, there were no
> >>> strong technical driving force, rather facilitating solving technical
> >>> issues. I also plan to do similarly during my tenure. For example, I am
> >>> a strong supporter of team maintained packages, but that does not mean I
> >>> would/should force everyone to quit single maintainer practice. I would
> >>> start more conversations around this instead and try to find a solution.
> >>>
> >>> So, I urge everyone to bring to notice the issues that they think are
> >>> important for the project so that we can discuss and find some solution.
> >>
> >>Per the Constitution, the DPL is meant to provide technical leadership
> >>as well, but as you say, we've somewhat drifted away from that.
> >>
> > Sorry, I failed to find the technical leadership part in the constitution.
> 
> Just the "Lead discussions amongst Developers." part.

"9. Lead discussions amongst Developers.

The Project Leader should attempt to participate in discussions amongst the
Developers in a helpful way which seeks to bring the discussion to bear on the
key issues at hand. The Project Leader should not use the Leadership position
to promote their own personal views."

I still don't see anything close to "the DPL is meant to provide technical
leadership" in the above section. I'm not English native and might be missing
something?

Bests,

--
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz

Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Q: Technical Visions Marc Haber <mh+debian-vote@zugschlus.de> - 2026-03-22 10:50 +0100
  Re: Q: Technical Visions Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-04-01 23:20 +0200
    Re: Q: Technical Visions Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-04-03 11:20 +0200
      Re: Q: Technical Visions Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2026-04-03 20:30 +0200
      Re: Q: Technical Visions Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-04-03 20:50 +0200
        Re: Q: Technical Visions Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-04-05 12:40 +0200
          Re: Q: Technical Visions Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <tiago@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 13:50 +0200
            Re: Q: Technical Visions Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-04-05 14:00 +0200
              Re: Q: Technical Visions Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <tiago@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 14:10 +0200
              Re: Q: Technical Visions Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 15:40 +0200
                Re: Q: Technical Visions Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-04-05 17:40 +0200
                Re: Q: Technical Visions Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 19:20 +0200
              Re: Q: Technical Visions Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> - 2026-04-05 19:20 +0200

csiph-web