Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > linux.debian.vote > #5682
| From | Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.vote |
| Subject | Re: Q: Technical Visions |
| Date | 2026-04-01 23:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MFb8J-bZcV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MBnBv-9pEB-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 22/03/26 10:48, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi Sruthi, > > many people see Debian as a technical project, providing The Universal > Operating System to the world. > > What do you plan to do during your DPL term to support and advance > Debian's technical leadership and excellence? What is in your opinion > the most pressing technical issue that should be tackled during the > 2026 DPL tenure? Are there technical teams and aspects of Debian that > need assistance and/or suppport to improve their results with regard > to The Universal Operating System? > > What will you say to people who remind you that Debian is a mainly > technical project that of course has some social aspects, and voice > concerns that they fear that you might try to treat Debian as a social > and/or political platform while neglecting the technical aspects of > the project? Debian is definitely a technical project with strong social and political aspects. But I believe that DPL is a social and political position. If a DPL decides to drive the technical aspects of Debian based on their personal beliefs, it will be against our do-o-cracy culture. Will it be good as a DPL if I say Debian "should" or "should not" comply to "age verification requirement" without any discussion? I plan to stand by the decisions the project takes. From whatever I have observed in recent DPL tenures, there were no strong technical driving force, rather facilitating solving technical issues. I also plan to do similarly during my tenure. For example, I am a strong supporter of team maintained packages, but that does not mean I would/should force everyone to quit single maintainer practice. I would start more conversations around this instead and try to find a solution. So, I urge everyone to bring to notice the issues that they think are important for the project so that we can discuss and find some solution. > > Greetings > Marc > >
Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Q: Technical Visions Marc Haber <mh+debian-vote@zugschlus.de> - 2026-03-22 10:50 +0100
Re: Q: Technical Visions Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-04-01 23:20 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-04-03 11:20 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2026-04-03 20:30 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-04-03 20:50 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-04-05 12:40 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <tiago@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 13:50 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-04-05 14:00 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Tiago Bortoletto Vaz <tiago@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 14:10 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 15:40 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2026-04-05 17:40 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 19:20 +0200
Re: Q: Technical Visions Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> - 2026-04-05 19:20 +0200
csiph-web