Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how

Subject	Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how
Newsgroups	sci.math
References	(7 earlier) <ce588a75-4ea6-4a78-8be2-d729e80d19cd@att.net> <AddHfbN-qz8pWaxRgIvS5xiFQw8@jntp> <d56cbcbb-3d26-4606-8572-366eaadc608f@att.net> <4P8mN6L4GiZRL_cw9VoFlkFRsyI@jntp> <0682ec96-856f-4659-918d-f4f08edada3e@att.net>
From	Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date	2024-05-05 11:30 -0700
Message-ID	<HlGdnSePy7HPTar7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 05/05/2024 10:59 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 5/3/2024 4:31 PM, WM wrote:
>> Le 03/05/2024 à 21:32, Jim Burns a écrit :
>>> On 5/3/2024 9:57 AM, WM wrote:
>
>>>> It is the idea that infinite sets are fixed
>>>> such that no element can be added or removed.
>>>> It is the idea that
>>>> the natural numbers reach immediately from 0 until ω
>
>>> Each number which CAN be counted.to from 0
>>> is before
>>> ℵ₀.many numbers which CAN be counted.to from 0
>>
>> If all could be counted to,
>> they would not remain after every counted number.
>
> 1.
>  From each number n which CAN be counted.to
> the numbers which CAN be counted.to reach immediately
> more.than.1 from n to n+2
>
> None of these immediate more.than.1 numbers remain
> after every number n which CAN be counted.to.
>
>
> The meaning of (1.) depends upon
> 'n' NOT being
> the true name of any number which CAN be counted.to,
> the way that "Rumpelstiltskin" is the true name of
> a certain straw.into.gold.spinner.
>
> An analogy better than "name" is "pronoun"
> 'n' is more like a pronoun than a name.
> "It is a natural number", etc.
>
> Variable.names are a big improvement over pronouns
> because, in every natural language I'm aware of,
> there are no more than a handful of pronouns,
> used with many handfuls of referents, and
> their distinct referents are kept distinct
> by context, AKA, figuring.it.out.
> Even if the figuring.out doesn't fail, a lot of work.
>
> The expression
> | x < y and y < z implies x < z
> |
> is a big improvement in clarity over
> a paragraph of muddle with three pronouns.
> x y z act like pronouns, though.
>
> 2.
>  From each number n which CAN be counted.to
> the numbers which CAN be counted.to reach immediately
> more.than.2 from n to n+3
>
> None of these immediate more.than.3 numbers remain
> after every number n which CAN be counted.to.
>
> 3.
>  From each number n which CAN be counted.to
> the numbers which CAN be counted.to reach immediately
> more.than.3 from n to n+4
>
> None of these immediate more.than.3 numbers remain
> after every number n which CAN be counted.to.
>
> ...
>
> k.
>  From each number n which CAN be counted.to
> the numbers which CAN be counted.to reach immediately
> more.than.k from n to n+k+1
>
> None of these immediate more.than.k numbers remain
> after every number n which CAN be counted.to.
>
> ...
>
>> If all could be counted to,
>> they would not remain after every counted number.
>
>  From each number n which CAN be counted.to
> for each number k which CAN be counted.to
> more.than.k numbers which CAN be counted.to
> can be reached immediately
> from n to n+k+1
>
> None of these immediate more.than.k numbers remain
> after every number n which CAN be counted.to.
>
>

How about disambiguating quantifiers so that something
like the universal quantifier gets disambiguated to
reflect a for-any/for-each/for-every/for-all when it's
so that things like the Sorites/Heap or transfer principle
apply.

Similarly the existential quantifier is often to be
disambiguated "exists", "exists-unique", "exists-plural",
these kinds of things.

English as a language has a rich variety of copulas.

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-18 18:09 -0400
  Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-19 15:05 +0000
    Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-19 15:16 -0400
      Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-20 16:23 +0000
        Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-21 14:08 -0400
          Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-22 15:35 +0000
            Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-22 18:08 +0200
              Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-22 17:45 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-22 20:17 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-04-22 19:07 -0400
            Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 13:32 -0400
              Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-22 17:56 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 23:51 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-23 18:57 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-23 15:55 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-24 16:57 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-24 20:01 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-25 19:43 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-24 15:42 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-25 20:03 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-04-25 19:09 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-25 19:11 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-26 01:57 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-26 14:37 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-26 14:53 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-04-26 21:27 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-01 18:46 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-02 01:32 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-02 14:00 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-02 20:49 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-03 05:07 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 15:07 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:57 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 16:09 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 14:12 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 16:15 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 14:49 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-03 15:32 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 20:31 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 14:50 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-03 19:01 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-05 13:59 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 11:30 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-05 18:02 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 12:36 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-06 16:15 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 13:22 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 14:40 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-08 13:20 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 17:14 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-09 12:56 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-09 18:55 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-09 18:45 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-10 06:59 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 13:12 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-10 18:26 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 17:17 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 04:18 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 06:38 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 10:40 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 08:47 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 15:24 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 14:05 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 14:44 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 16:11 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 19:47 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 18:17 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 18:44 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 11:08 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-12 13:46 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 11:21 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 12:34 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-13 00:11 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 13:22 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 13:43 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-14 13:15 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-15 10:10 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-15 12:56 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-15 16:57 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-16 02:03 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-16 12:50 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 09:09 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-18 14:16 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 13:11 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-19 07:07 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-19 13:28 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 19:25 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-11 07:02 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 06:44 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-06 18:59 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-06 16:16 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-06 20:28 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-06 18:11 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-08 19:55 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 17:55 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 02:27 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 02:54 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 03:11 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-10 12:24 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 21:14 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 02:35 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 02:42 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 21:14 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-10 12:31 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-10 12:18 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-10 10:59 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-13 20:21 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-13 18:47 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-14 11:10 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-14 10:15 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-15 13:13 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-15 16:39 +0200
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 16:32 -0700
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-14 11:15 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-14 16:26 +0200
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-14 17:24 +0200
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-15 13:18 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-15 16:49 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-10 14:56 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-10 21:34 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-10 19:44 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-11 05:00 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-11 05:32 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 14:49 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 17:01 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-11 05:26 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-13 20:31 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-13 20:27 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 16:33 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 13:31 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 13:37 -0700
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-10 17:25 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 15:28 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 18:00 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 18:34 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-07 15:16 -0400
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-07 17:28 -0400
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 20:29 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 20:56 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 21:25 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-08 06:06 -0400
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-08 13:18 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-05-06 20:52 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 18:32 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-06 02:10 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-06 19:00 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-05-03 23:31 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-04 22:09 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:47 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:45 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 15:03 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:41 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 16:06 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 12:42 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 22:43 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 19:09 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-06 13:21 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-05-03 23:41 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-06 19:05 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:35 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-27 14:39 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-27 14:46 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-28 13:29 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-28 10:59 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-04-30 11:56 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-04-30 15:21 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-30 13:12 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-04-30 15:26 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-04-30 15:39 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-04-30 15:55 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 21:29 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-30 13:00 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-05-01 23:46 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-01 23:59 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:29 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-05-03 19:27 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 15:04 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-04-26 12:41 -0700
              Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-22 20:48 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 15:36 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-22 21:40 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-04-22 21:44 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-23 01:01 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 20:52 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 17:03 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-04-22 19:23 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-23 01:28 +0200
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-04-22 20:12 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-23 02:21 +0200
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 21:03 -0400
            Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-04-22 19:07 -0400

csiph-web