Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how

From	Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net>
Newsgroups	sci.math
Subject	Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how
Date	2024-05-11 17:01 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<e2d2ec08-7f0e-4329-9ce2-51bacc0c2d69@att.net> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <9XyUBE0IPOJTIEc95u0LtlnjWsI@jntp> <1f4bd9ca-5ade-43c0-a50d-927ce267d059@att.net> <v1lst1$1he0g$1@dont-email.me> <620e9275-0f89-4681-9f51-df6eb6b21edf@att.net> <v1mmvn$1qn3h$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/10/2024 11:00 PM, Moebius wrote:
> Am 11.05.2024 um 01:44 schrieb Jim Burns:

>> I think it can be argued that
>> ω [...] exists
>> independently of set theories.
>
> Quite an interresting view.
>
> Historical fact:
> Infinite ordinals were introduced by Cantor
> in the context of his "transfinite set theory".

That makes sense to me.
Without transfinite set theory,
what good are transfinite ordinals?
Transfinite flying rainbow sparkle ponies?

> But I get your idea (I think).
>
> We may imagine (!)
> infinitely many natural numbers
> independent of set theory:

This is perhaps a small point:
I would prefer "We may describe..."

Our imaginations are too limited for
the objects of even quite mundane mathematics.
But we can describe them and reason about them,
without imagining them.

> 1 < 2 < 3 < ...
>
> Of course, no set IN which
> "contains" these numbers in this case.
> 
> In addition to all these numbers
> we may imagine an additional "number" which
> is larger than all these (natural) numbers:
>
> 1 < 2 < 3 < ... < ω.
>
> Right?

Agreed.
I would say "describe", though.

I think that the imagine/describe distinction
gets at the source of WM's troubles.
WM _imagines_
a natural number after all natural numbers.

But imagination is -- _should_ be -- flexible.
So flexible, we can imagine flying rainbow
sparkle ponies and largest natural numbers
_without their existing_

Descriptions written in ink or pixels
aren't as flexible as that.

I think descriptions aren't so user.friendly
as imaginings. That's my explanation for how
descriptions, with their great advantage,
"lose" in the struggle for our attention.

> (Actually, I sometimes didn't like the term
> "infinite ordinal" in this connection.
> My thought was:
> "It's just an additional number." :-P)

But what is a number?
Sometimes this, and sometimes that.
The devil is in the details.

Back to sci.math | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 13:32 -0400
  Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-22 17:56 +0000
    Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 23:51 -0400
      Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-23 18:57 +0000
        Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-23 15:55 -0400
          Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-24 16:57 +0000
            Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-24 20:01 +0200
              Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-25 19:43 +0000
            Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-24 15:42 -0400
              Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-25 20:03 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-04-25 19:09 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-25 19:11 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-26 01:57 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-26 14:37 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-26 14:53 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-04-26 21:27 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-01 18:46 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-02 01:32 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-02 14:00 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-02 20:49 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-03 05:07 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 15:07 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:57 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 16:09 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 14:12 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 16:15 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 14:49 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-03 15:32 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 20:31 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 14:50 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-03 19:01 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-05 13:59 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-05 11:30 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-05 18:02 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 12:36 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-06 16:15 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 13:22 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 14:40 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-08 13:20 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 17:14 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-09 12:56 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-09 18:55 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-09 18:45 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-10 06:59 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 13:12 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-10 18:26 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 17:17 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 04:18 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 06:38 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 10:40 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 08:47 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 15:24 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 14:05 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 14:44 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 16:11 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 19:47 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 18:17 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 18:44 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 11:08 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-12 13:46 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 11:21 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 12:34 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-13 00:11 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 13:22 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 13:43 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-14 13:15 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-15 10:10 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-15 12:56 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-15 16:57 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-16 02:03 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-16 12:50 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 09:09 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-18 14:16 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 13:11 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-19 07:07 -0700
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-19 13:28 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 19:25 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-11 07:02 -0400
                Re: universal quantification, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-11 06:44 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-06 18:59 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-06 16:16 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-06 20:28 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-06 18:11 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-08 19:55 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 17:55 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 02:27 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 02:54 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 03:11 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-10 12:24 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 21:14 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 02:35 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-09 02:42 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-08 21:14 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-10 12:31 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-10 12:18 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-10 10:59 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-13 20:21 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-13 18:47 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-14 11:10 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-14 10:15 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-15 13:13 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-15 16:39 +0200
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 16:32 -0700
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-14 11:15 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-14 16:26 +0200
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-14 17:24 +0200
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-15 13:18 +0000
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-15 16:49 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-10 14:56 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-10 21:34 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-10 19:44 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-11 05:00 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-11 05:32 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 14:49 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-11 17:01 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-11 05:26 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-13 20:31 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-13 20:27 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 16:33 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 13:31 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 13:37 -0700
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-10 17:25 -0400
                Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-10 15:28 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 18:00 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 18:34 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 12:42 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 13:25 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 15:10 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 17:30 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-06-07 22:33 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-07 15:16 -0400
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-07 17:28 -0400
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 20:29 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 20:56 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-07 21:25 -0700
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-05-08 06:06 -0400
                Re: universal quantifiers, because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-08 13:18 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-05-06 20:52 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-06 18:32 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-06 02:10 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-06 19:00 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-05-03 23:31 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> - 2024-05-04 22:09 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:47 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:45 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 15:03 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:41 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 16:06 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 12:42 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-03 22:43 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 19:09 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-05-06 13:21 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-05-03 23:41 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x))= g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-06 19:05 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:35 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-27 14:39 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-27 14:46 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-28 13:29 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-28 10:59 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-04-30 11:56 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-04-30 15:21 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-04-30 13:12 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-04-30 15:26 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-04-30 15:39 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-04-30 15:55 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-04-30 21:29 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-30 13:00 -0400
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <franz.fritsche@yahoo.de> - 2024-05-01 23:46 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-05-01 23:59 +0200
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> - 2024-05-03 13:29 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how joes <noreply@example.com> - 2024-05-03 19:27 +0000
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-03 15:04 -0700
                Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-04-26 12:41 -0700
  Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-22 20:48 +0200
    Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 15:36 -0400
      Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-22 21:40 +0200
        Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Tom Bola <Tom@bolamail.etc> - 2024-04-22 21:44 +0200
          Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-23 01:01 +0200
            Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 20:52 -0400
        Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 17:03 -0400
          Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-04-22 19:23 -0400
          Re: because g⤨(g⁻¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-23 01:28 +0200
            Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-04-22 20:12 -0400
              Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Moebius <moebius@example.invalid> - 2024-04-23 02:21 +0200
              Re: because g?(g?¹(x)) = g(y) [1/2] Re: how Jim Burns <james.g.burns@att.net> - 2024-04-22 21:03 -0400

csiph-web