Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #173304

Re: Background check

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/13/13 12:43 PM, in article enf83.3at3@rooftop.invalid, "owl"
<owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:

> 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> wrote:
>> owl wrote:
> 
>>> h
> 
> 
>> Slider troll posting drivel.
> 
>> Looks like trolls got badly toasted, or something important has happened.
> 
>> Microshaft to loose 20% of its revenue?
> 
>> Appile loosing its slide to unlock obvious software patent?
> 
>> Appile loosing its case where its MBA's (read non-techies)
>> have been ordered not to use the courts as business tools?
> 
> 
>> Linux still wins.
> 
> "Loosing"?  Don't they teach English in England?
> 
That is the only error you see in his word salad?


-- 
"Blocking adolescents¹ access to porn, or keeping them ignorant of sex in
any way, is likely to stunt their emotional growth and make them vulnerable
to mistakes that can hurt them badly." -- Richard Stallman

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 18:15 +0000
  Re: Background check 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-13 20:27 +0100
    Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 19:43 +0000
      Re: Background check Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:05 -0700
    Re: Background check chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
      Re: Background check Gregory Shearman <ZekeGregory@netscape.net> - 2013-04-13 22:15 +0000
        Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 23:25 +0000
      Re: Background check owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2013-04-13 23:21 +0000
    Re: Background check Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-04-13 22:39 +0200
      Re: Background check 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2013-04-13 21:51 +0100
        Re: Background check Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-04-13 22:58 +0200
          Re: Background check Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 14:15 -0700
        7 posts bizarre and baseless conspiracy theory aimed at pleasing the herd Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 14:01 -0700
      Re: Background check GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:16 -0600

csiph-web