Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #5047

Re: RPC and BT?

Subject Re: RPC and BT?
Newsgroups comp.sys.acorn.misc
From Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com>
Date 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100
Message-ID <92f57a8452.dougjwebb@doug.j.webb.btinternet.com> (permalink)
References <528464ae15dave@davenoise.co.uk> <528466e679tim@invalid.org.uk> <175e698452.dougjwebb@doug.j.webb.btinternet.com> <mpro.m2vv4v005nfsh01cs@wingsandbeaks.org.uk.invalid>

Show all headers | View raw


In message <mpro.m2vv4v005nfsh01cs@wingsandbeaks.org.uk.invalid>
          Jeremy Nicoll - news posts 
<jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> wrote:

> Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> wrote:

>> Also you need to be careful in that even lines to the same premises can
>> exhibit different speeds and throughput as thats my experience with the
>> two ADSL lines coming in to my house. I've had entertaining discussions
>> about the speed difference and lets just say the line that terminates in
>> the house at the earliest/shortest main point isn't the quickest but the
>> autorobotots on the support lines still spout out the same line "it varies
>> on the length of your line" even though one is at least 10 mtrs shorter by
>> length in my house than the other to the termination point.

> While they're "spouting", you seem to have missed the point that it's not
> the extra 10m of wire in your house that may make the difference.  Those two
> lines presumably both come from your local exchange, and go to your house,
> but there's no reason why they need to follow the same route via BT's cable
> ducts, overhead lines etc apart from that.  For all you know one might be
> more or less directly to you and the other may take a detour via some other
> cabinets which had spare capacity when one or other line was connected.

Yes agree and should have mentioned that as well.

My point being that I had a difference between to ADSL's coming to 
seemingly the same place of 1.5MB between the good and poor one and 
they would not look in to it as it was within acceptable limits and 
they tried to fob me off and to tell me that it was due to distance my 
home was from the exchange and not the route/cable quality or exchange 
equipment I was connected to. On one occasion I was told I was lucky 
to get any broadband even though I had service for 8yrs plus.

Anyway I got it solved after some persistance and once I got past the 
autoque robots. Once past them the level of service I got from the 
support team was very good indeed as I had the DSlam equipement I was 
attached to changed, config rebuilt and the line pairs changed from 
the exchange to my house.


-- 
See and experience the future using ARM Technology - BeagleBoard -xM, 
Cortex A8 and RISC OS 5.19.

Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

RPC and BT? "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:04 +0100
  Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:29 +0100
    Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 13:56 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 14:36 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 15:20 +0100
  Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 14:06 +0100
    Re: RPC and BT? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-22 16:05 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:04 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 22:26 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:43 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:08 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:03 +0000
              Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 09:06 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 02:15 +0200
              Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 19:57 +0100
                Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 05:25 +0200
                Re: RPC and BT? cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-04-24 13:25 +0100
            Re: RPC and BT? Rosemary Miskin <miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 19:20 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:16 +0100
        Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 20:01 +0100
          Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 09:30 +0100
      Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 00:01 +0100

csiph-web