Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #5038
| From | Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.misc |
| Subject | Re: RPC and BT? |
| Date | 2012-04-22 13:29 +0100 |
| Organization | timil.com |
| Message-ID | <528466e679tim@invalid.org.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <528464ae15dave@davenoise.co.uk> |
In article <528464ae15dave@davenoise.co.uk>, Dave Plowman (News) <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote: > Took my laptop next door and found it seemed to work rather quicker. > Their ISP is BT - mine was Pipex now Talktalk or whatever they call > themselves now. Do Pipex/talk Talk etc., have their own equipment installed in your exchange or (as mine does here) does your ISP resell a BT connexion? www.samknows.com/broadband/exchange_search It may only be a better quality line, or a better/newer ADSL modem giving better 'reception' down the wire. BT may be crap at a lot of things but their Home Hubs seem pretty good. [Snip] > If I went over to BT, would there be problems setting everything up to > work in the same way? Can't see why there would be. -- from Tim Hill who welcomes incoming email to tim at timil dot com. * Share in a better energy supplier: http://tjrh.eu/coopnrg * Share in cheaper ethical telecoms: http://tjrh.eu/phone * Have a genuine & spam-proof address for Usenet http://www.invalid.org.uk/ ... "Praising what is lost, makes the remembrance dear" All's Well, Act v, Sc.3
Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RPC and BT? "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:04 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:29 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 13:56 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 14:36 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 15:20 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 14:06 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-22 16:05 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:04 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 22:26 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:43 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:08 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:03 +0000
Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 09:06 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 02:15 +0200
Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 19:57 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 05:25 +0200
Re: RPC and BT? cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-04-24 13:25 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Rosemary Miskin <miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 19:20 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:16 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 20:01 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 09:30 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 00:01 +0100
csiph-web