Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #5043
| From | Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.misc |
| Subject | Re: RPC and BT? |
| Date | 2012-04-22 15:20 +0100 |
| Organization | timil.com |
| Message-ID | <5284711534tim@invalid.org.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <528464ae15dave@davenoise.co.uk> <528466e679tim@invalid.org.uk> <175e698452.dougjwebb@doug.j.webb.btinternet.com> |
In article <175e698452.dougjwebb@doug.j.webb.btinternet.com>, Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> wrote: > In message <528466e679tim@invalid.org.uk> Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> > wrote: > > In article <528464ae15dave@davenoise.co.uk>, Dave Plowman (News) > > <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote: [Snip] > Don't forget if their router is used then it may be that it has 11n > wireless as opposed to 11g and some have gigabit ports all of which > help. It is highly unlikely that this will effect broadband speed. G and megabit ports are more than fast enough for the majority of non-FTTP broadband. > Also you need to be careful in that even lines to the same premises > can exhibit different speeds and throughput as thats my experience > with the two ADSL lines coming in to my house. I've had entertaining > discussions about the speed difference and lets just say the line that > terminates in the house at the earliest/shortest main point isn't the > quickest but the autorobotots on the support lines still spout out the > same line "it varies on the length of your line" even though one is at > least 10 mtrs shorter by length in my house than the other to the > termination point. Not only that but in the days of poor modem speeds a local BT engineer said he would make sure my line was included in the dry bundle, as opposed to the bundle which used to get submerged when it rained! > The other thing that varies things are ADSL equipement in the main > exchange , airborne interference, mains interference, extn sockets etc. Faceplates to the BT socket are meant to make a difference too. [Snip] -- from Tim Hill who welcomes incoming email to tim at timil dot com. * Share in a better energy supplier: http://tjrh.eu/coopnrg * Share in cheaper ethical telecoms: http://tjrh.eu/phone * Have a genuine & spam-proof address for Usenet http://www.invalid.org.uk/ ... "God shall be my hope, my stay, my guide, and lantern to my feet" Henry VI, Act ii, Sc.3
Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RPC and BT? "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:04 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 13:29 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 13:56 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Jeremy Nicoll - news posts <jn.nntp.scrap007@wingsandbeaks.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 14:36 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 17:08 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Tim Hill <tim@invalid.org.uk> - 2012-04-22 15:20 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 14:06 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-04-22 16:05 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:04 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Doug Webb <doug.j.webb@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-22 22:26 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? T M Smith <thomas.smith57@ntlworld.com> - 2012-04-22 22:43 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:08 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Tony Moore <old_coaster@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:03 +0000
Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 09:06 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 02:15 +0200
Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 19:57 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Rick Murray <heyrickmail-usenet@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 05:25 +0200
Re: RPC and BT? cferris@freeRemoveuk.com.invalid - 2012-04-24 13:25 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Rosemary Miskin <miskin@orpheusmail.co.uk> - 2012-04-23 19:20 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-22 23:16 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 20:01 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-04-24 09:30 +0100
Re: RPC and BT? spampling <spam.pling@btinternet.com> - 2012-04-23 00:01 +0100
csiph-web