Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Distribution of user skills |
| Date | 2016-12-06 18:39 -0400 |
| Organization | Bridgewater Institute for Advanced Study - Blacksmith Shop |
| Message-ID | <874m2gadhs.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> (permalink) |
| References | <o2698p$g1p$1@solani.org> <eanq5mFbb6sU1@mid.individual.net> <o26cai$sb5$1@dont-email.me> |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: > Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> wrote: > >> On 2016-12-06, RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> wrote: >> >>> https://www.nngroup.com/articles/computer-skill-levels/ >> >> [snip] >> >> TBH, much of the blame comes down to the total absence of training >> for the vast majority of computing end-users. > > And, even when present, the training often amounts to little more than: > > If you put this pointy thing there, then push this button on the soap > bar, then slide the pointy thing down here and push this other button > on the soap bar, then you'll do X. Many (a great many?) intelligent, well-educated users want exactly that and only that, become irritated or even belligerent when anyone tries to explain just how or why that button does X but not Y. I have a correspondent, retired from a successful career in securities trading, who becomes quite belligerent (or alternatively, scornful) if I mention such geekish words as byte, format or protocol. So I just discard his correspondence when I don't feel like doing a bunch of editing, decoding, reformatting, un-UTF-ing etc. of what his computer gratuitously adds when he hits the Send button. I have a neighbor who can be triggered into a rant -- about how her father could never just answer a question, had to *explain* everything -- just by offering to explain something to her that she clearly doesn't understand. >> And I put that largely down to the laughable application of the term >> "intuitive". Yeah. Right. > > Nothing about computers is "intuitive" in the sense that someone with > zero background can come up to speed without some help somewhere. > > What GUI's provide, rather than "intuitive" interfaces, is interfaces > that are easier to memorize for most users because they are picture > based rather than "conversational" text based. The command line is like language. The GUI is like shopping. -- Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Distribution of user skills RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2016-12-06 07:00 -0500
Re: Distribution of user skills Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-12-06 12:44 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-12-06 12:52 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-12-06 10:04 -0500
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-06 18:39 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2016-12-07 11:35 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-06 18:23 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-12-06 22:26 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-12-06 22:46 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-07 03:06 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-12-07 11:00 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-12-07 15:52 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-12-07 11:57 -0500
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-07 14:01 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-12-07 14:53 -0500
Re: Distribution of user skills Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-12-07 23:36 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2016-12-07 21:13 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-12-08 12:12 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2016-12-08 12:16 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-07 02:53 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-12-07 11:05 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-07 16:12 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Bob Eager <news0006@eager.cx> - 2016-12-07 21:20 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-08 15:02 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2016-12-07 23:31 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Kees Nuyt <k.nuyt@nospam.demon.nl> - 2016-12-08 10:42 +0100
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-08 15:27 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills "Kerr Mudd-John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2016-12-08 21:00 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-09 03:22 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2016-12-09 09:53 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2016-12-10 04:00 -0400
Re: Distribution of user skills Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca> - 2016-12-10 22:34 -0500
Re: Distribution of user skills Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-12-07 12:52 +1100
Re: Distribution of user skills "Andy K." <andy.k466@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 08:26 +0100
Re: Distribution of user skills Adrian Caspersz <email@here.invalid> - 2016-12-07 11:40 +0000
Re: Distribution of user skills Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2016-12-07 20:32 +0000
csiph-web