Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #393189
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: do { quit; } else { } |
| Date | 2025-05-05 16:12 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86o6w64ppv.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <86o6x5at05.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt712u$1m84p$1@dont-email.me> <20250409170901.947@kylheku.com> <vt88bk$2rv8r$1@dont-email.me> <87wmbs45oa.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> |
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > [...] > >> Someone, not anyone but the all-knowing Tim, said: "and those types >> are not compatible, because the two struct tags are different." >> >> Do you agree with that? Or is there something more to making two types >> be incompatible? > > I don't recall the exact discussion and I wouldn't try to speak > for Tim, but I suspect he was saying that the fact that the two > struct tags are different is enough to know that the types are > not compatible. [...] Considering the circumstances, rather than focusing on what I (may have) meant, it seems better to focus on what is true, whether I meant it or not.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: do { quit; } else { } Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 16:12 -0700
Re: do { quit; } else { } Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 16:36 -0700
Re: do { quit; } else { } Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 17:01 -0700
csiph-web