Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #393189
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: do { quit; } else { } |
| Date | Mon, 05 May 2025 16:12:12 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <86o6w64ppv.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <86ecy5fjin.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406190321.000001dc@yahoo.com> <86plhodtsw.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250407210248.00006457@yahoo.com> <vt15lq$bjs0$3@dont-email.me> <vt2lp6$1qtjd$1@dont-email.me> <vt31m5$2513i$1@dont-email.me> <vt3d4g$2djqe$1@dont-email.me> <vt3iqh$2ka99$1@dont-email.me> <868qoaeezc.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt3oeo$2oq3p$1@dont-email.me> <86mscqcpy1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt48go$35hh3$2@dont-email.me> <86iknecjz8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt4del$3a9sk$1@dont-email.me> <86o6x5at05.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vt712u$1m84p$1@dont-email.me> <20250409170901.947@kylheku.com> <vt88bk$2rv8r$1@dont-email.me> <87wmbs45oa.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 06 May 2025 01:12:17 +0200 (CEST) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="f84420402be78ce51ba0e8f0077f27e2"; logging-data="1634369"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18F4CoAiqyGfI2JPawsmM+OdPBk3NdCOCw=" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:OQJJFRY9r1iBHYmhIMn8BmgW7WA= sha1:giMdRMFJDtkuIt0kyjA5WeJFZ/A= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.c:393189 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > [...] > >> Someone, not anyone but the all-knowing Tim, said: "and those types >> are not compatible, because the two struct tags are different." >> >> Do you agree with that? Or is there something more to making two types >> be incompatible? > > I don't recall the exact discussion and I wouldn't try to speak > for Tim, but I suspect he was saying that the fact that the two > struct tags are different is enough to know that the types are > not compatible. [...] Considering the circumstances, rather than focusing on what I (may have) meant, it seems better to focus on what is true, whether I meant it or not.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: do { quit; } else { } Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 16:12 -0700
Re: do { quit; } else { } Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 16:36 -0700
Re: do { quit; } else { } Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 17:01 -0700
csiph-web