Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.c > #393193
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: do { quit; } else { } |
| Date | 2025-05-05 17:01 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86bjs64nfr.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (16 earlier) <20250409170901.947@kylheku.com> <vt88bk$2rv8r$1@dont-email.me> <87wmbs45oa.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86o6w64ppv.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87v7qefx4r.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> |
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes: > >> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: >>> [...] >>> >>>> Someone, not anyone but the all-knowing Tim, said: "and those types >>>> are not compatible, because the two struct tags are different." >>>> >>>> Do you agree with that? Or is there something more to making two types >>>> be incompatible? >>> >>> I don't recall the exact discussion and I wouldn't try to speak >>> for Tim, but I suspect he was saying that the fact that the two >>> struct tags are different is enough to know that the types are >>> not compatible. [...] >> >> Considering the circumstances, rather than focusing on what I >> (may have) meant, it seems better to focus on what is true, >> whether I meant it or not. > > Feel free to do so, rather than resurrecting a post from nearly a > month ago to criticize me for what I chose to focus on My comment wasn't meant as a criticism, but only a suggested improvement. I'm sorry if it came across differently. Also the comment was not meant as a statement about you but about the style of the posting. It's about wording, not about you personally. > and adding nothing to the actual discussion. > > The discussion died out weeks ago. Why would you resurrect it? I had no intention of resurrecting a discussion. I responded because I had something to say.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: do { quit; } else { } Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 16:12 -0700
Re: do { quit; } else { } Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 16:36 -0700
Re: do { quit; } else { } Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 17:01 -0700
csiph-web