Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #390017
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: So You Think You Can Const? |
| Date | 2025-01-13 11:55 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86ldve5vzl.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <vlqd4j$3s4ai$1@dont-email.me> <874j27qfp7.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250110122353.00005377@yahoo.com> <vlr8if$17rn$1@dont-email.me> <20250112130744.00000118@yahoo.com> |
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:50:07 -0500
> James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 1/10/25 05:23, Michael S wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 23:40:52 -0800
>>> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> After the call to free(), the int object logically no longer
>>>> exists. Also, the value of the pointer object ptr becomes
>>>> indeterminate. Attempting to refer to the value of either ptr or
>>>> *ptr has undefined behavior.
>>>
>>> I believe that the Standard really says that, but find the part
>>> about value of ptr variable ridiculous. It breaks natural hierarchy
>>> by which standard library is somewhat special, but it is not above
>>> rules of core language. free() is defined as function rather than
>>> macro. By rules of core language, a function call can not modify
>>> the value of local variable at caller's scope, unless pointers to
>>> the variable was passed to it explicitly.
>>
>> And that applies to free() just as much as any user-defined function.
>>
>> Keep in mind that if p is a value returned by a call to a memory
>> management function (alloc_aligned(), malloc(), calloc() or
>> realloc()), the values of all pointers anywhere in the program that
>> point at any location in the block of memory allocated by the call to
>> that memory management function become indeterminate at the same
>> time. This doesn't mean that free() has permission to change the bit
>> pattern stored in any of those pointer objects. It doesn't. There's
>> no legal way to access the values stored in those objects; the only
>> thing you can do with those objects as a whole is to store a new
>> value in them. It is, however, legal to access the individual bytes
>> that make up the pointer's representation. Those bytes are themselves
>> objects, and changing the values stored in those bytes would
>> therefore violate 6.2.4p2: "An object exists, has a constant
>> address36) , and retains its last-stored value throughout its
>> lifetime."
>>
>> What the indeterminate value of those pointers does mean is that
>> implementations have permission to remove that entire block of memory
>> from the list of valid pointer locations. On a system which uses
>> memory maps, that can be as simple as modifying one entry in the
>> memory map table.
>>
>> By the way, this argument was controversial when I made it in a
>> discussion on this newsgroup in 2003 in a thread titled "pointer after
>> free indeterminate (your example James)". Yes, I am the "James" in
>> that title. You can look up that thread using Google Groups, if you
>> want to examine the arguments for and against. I don't believe that
>> there's been any relevant changes in the standard, but it's been two
>> decades and several revisions of the standard, so I could be wrong
>> about that.
>
> Tried to read the old discussion. Didn't understand much.
> But it strengthened my opinion: it's ridiculous. Standard would be way
> better with this nonsense removed.
> The function below should be guaranteed by standard to return 42.
> int foo(void)
> {
> char* a = malloc(100);
> if (!a) return 42;
> char* b = a + 42;
> free(a);
> return b - a;
> }
Imposing that requirement could mean assuming a level of
architectural support that some hardware doesn't provide.
Historically the decision made in the original C standard
was the most sensible choice available. Even though the
current description leaves something to be desired, it's
hard to find a compelling argument that the rule be changed
now.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-07 20:32 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-07 22:11 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-08 15:02 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-08 15:05 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-08 15:16 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-08 16:53 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-08 17:05 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-08 17:24 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 14:55 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-09 01:09 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-09 04:24 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-09 10:35 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 13:37 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 13:56 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-09 07:49 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-09 23:23 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-10 00:37 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-10 00:45 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-09 17:43 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-10 03:14 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-10 03:51 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-10 04:05 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-12 22:10 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-13 09:58 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-13 14:23 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-13 17:30 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-13 20:30 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-13 21:45 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-14 09:02 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-01-14 12:44 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-14 14:50 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-14 13:06 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-01-14 18:53 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-14 20:31 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-14 17:20 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-14 21:15 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-15 09:29 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 13:35 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 14:05 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 14:29 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 02:48 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 02:51 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-15 03:12 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 04:19 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 04:30 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-14 12:46 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 12:38 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-01-15 14:05 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 15:18 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-15 20:16 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 13:47 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-15 20:03 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 13:51 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 14:01 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 14:06 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 14:22 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-12 22:55 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 14:11 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-18 11:36 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-19 14:42 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 16:03 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-10 01:04 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-01-12 22:29 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-12 23:45 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-13 10:08 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-13 07:35 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-13 10:05 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Ar Rakin <rakinar2@onesoftnet.eu.org> - 2025-02-26 18:12 +0600
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 13:57 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 13:54 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 14:17 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 13:51 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-08 14:10 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-08 14:20 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-08 20:14 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-08 12:12 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-09 08:12 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 14:48 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-09 01:04 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-09 07:56 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-08 12:43 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-09 00:49 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 14:15 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-08 09:46 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-08 11:25 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-08 13:25 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 13:53 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 14:46 +0100
What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-08 15:42 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-08 17:18 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-08 17:35 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-08 19:39 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-01-08 11:45 -0500
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-08 11:52 -0800
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:20 -0800
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-01-08 15:27 -0500
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 13:41 -0800
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-01-09 00:09 -0500
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 21:34 -0800
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-01-09 10:30 -0500
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 18:12 +0200
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Phillip <nntp@fulltermprivacy.com> - 2025-01-09 12:40 -0500
Re: What is wrong with malloc? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-09 14:53 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-09 17:27 +0200
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-09 13:15 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 14:12 -0800
Re: What is wrong with malloc? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 15:00 -0800
Re: What is wrong with malloc? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-09 14:58 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-09 09:07 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-09 10:07 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-09 15:11 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-01-09 15:28 +0000
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-09 21:39 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-10 15:30 +0100
Re: What is wrong with malloc? (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-08 14:10 -0500
Re: What is wrong with malloc? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:25 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-08 16:24 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 12:08 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-08 08:48 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-08 12:24 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 13:01 -0800
Or it could be that... (Was: So You Think You Can Const?) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-01-08 21:32 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-09 09:12 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 03:21 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-09 12:26 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-09 19:47 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-09 17:48 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:01 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 23:40 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-10 12:23 +0200
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-10 08:50 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-12 13:07 +0200
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 03:22 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-01-12 16:54 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-12 23:10 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-12 23:31 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-13 11:55 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 10:37 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-10 18:58 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 11:08 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-10 19:11 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-10 20:58 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-13 11:46 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 16:11 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-22 09:26 -0700
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 20:57 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-01-11 09:16 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 18:23 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-10 18:37 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 11:08 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-11 08:38 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-12 02:29 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 20:03 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-12 18:26 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-12 22:38 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-09 15:18 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Andrey Tarasevich <andreytarasevich@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-09 22:04 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-10 11:31 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-10 10:56 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-11 12:14 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-11 17:07 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-11 17:21 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-11 17:33 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-11 19:29 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 14:50 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-11 18:32 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-11 19:29 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-12 16:25 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-11 10:58 -0500
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-10 19:28 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-12 14:57 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-08 11:44 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-12 16:46 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-15 02:09 +0000
Re: So You Think You Can Const? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-15 09:39 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2025-01-15 13:52 +0100
Re: So You Think You Can Const? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 13:46 -0800
Re: So You Think You Can Const? Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-26 06:32 +0000
csiph-web