Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #16197
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Another little puzzle |
| Date | 2022-12-31 06:20 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86cz7zslik.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <algorithm-20221221130021@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <average-20221228125821@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <87tu1diu2s.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <864jtdtkt5.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87o7rlhtsv.fsf@bsb.me.uk> |
Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes: > Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes: > >> Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes: >> >> [...] >> >>> I found this problem interesting but only later in the discussion as >>> I have been using this metric for some time. What got interesting >>> (to me) was that there is another sound interpretation of the >>> average as suggested by Tim, [...] >> >> It wasn't my idea. I got it from a posting by Mike Terry on >> December 21. I hadn't seen that formulation of arithmetic mean >> before and I was amazed that it worked. So I can't really take >> any credit for the suggestion. >> >>> ironically prompted but a general definition of what might >>> constitute an average that I had posted and failed to follow >>> through on. >> >> I remember your posting as coming after the one by Mike Terry, >> and so I thought your comments were derived from his. Sorry if >> my conclusions there were off the mark. > > You are right in that MT posted the same general formulation 9 hours > before I did (though I'd not seen that). My confusion came from your > explanation, to me, of "conventional average": > > "Sorry, I meant to refer to your formulation of average" > > followed by the formula I gave rather than then entirely equivalent > one given by MT. Ahh, that makes sense. My comment muddied the waters; I was thinking of your formula and the MT formula as the same, and rather inadvertently said "your formulation" (after all, I was responding to and had quoted your formula) without mentioning that I had also read MT's post before responding. > Anyway, the credit I'm giving is for your considering this a > reasonable thing to try calculate for arc lengths, rather than > [...] Thank you for that. And in that respect I think I can modestly say that some credit is deserved (especially considering the amount of effort it took to code something up that calculated this measure).
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-30 01:00 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-29 23:25 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-30 14:04 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-31 00:24 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-31 06:42 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2022-12-31 17:04 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-01 01:24 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-01-08 07:45 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-08 17:17 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-08 20:41 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2023-01-08 21:14 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-08 22:31 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-09 03:25 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-09 11:22 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-09 20:37 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-10 09:06 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-11 02:41 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-11 10:01 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-12 01:00 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-01-10 23:36 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Y A <ya00000100000@yahoo.com> - 2023-01-11 02:39 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-01 01:10 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-01-08 07:17 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-08 19:43 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-08 19:59 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-01-10 23:25 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-31 06:20 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Augǝl <angel0000000001000000000000@mail.ee> - 2022-12-31 10:23 -0800
csiph-web