Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #16290
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-01-11 02:39 -0800 |
| References | (7 earlier) <868rinskhk.fsf@linuxsc.com> <topmiu$4ps$1@gioia.aioe.org> <868ridni7g.fsf@linuxsc.com> <tpeqaf$vje$1@gioia.aioe.org> <86fschmsjf.fsf@linuxsc.com> |
| Message-ID | <8a9b7c72-5ce7-4c75-b6ba-1a4b663b99ben@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Another little puzzle |
| From | Y A <ya00000100000@yahoo.com> |
Check out this ↓ http://generatingmiracluosnumbers.medianewsonline.com/Y.htm You might start to like it...... On Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 9:36:40 AM UTC+2, Tim Rentsch wrote: > "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mai...@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes: > > > On 2023-01-08 16:45, Tim Rentsch wrote: > > > >> "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mai...@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes: > >> > >>> Averaging arcs is equivalent to averaging angles. > >> > >> Angles are a one-dimensional measure. > > > > Averaging arcs is still equivalent to averaging angles, which is > > trivial result of elementary trigonometry. > > > >> Finding an arc length > >> "average" of points on a sphere needs a two-dimensional result. > > > > Points do not have arcs. > > > >>>> Now that I think about it, finding the point that minimizes the > >>>> great circle distances squared would be at least computationally > >>>> unpleasant. > >>> > >>> See above, it is just angles to average. > >> > >> Apparently you have not yet understood the problem. > > > > Again, averages of arcs and angles are equivalent up to a > > multiplier. > > > >> Why don't > >> you try writing a program that inputs a set of points normalized > >> to be on the unit sphere, and then calculates the arc length > >> average point (on the unit sphere) of those input points? > > > > Why don't you write a formula specifying your need? > > > > Programs are written according to the specifications. Numeric > > programs require a properly stated problem, rather than a bunch > > of words arbitrarily thrown in a meaningless sentence as above. > After reading this response and also three other responses of > yours (to Ben Bacarisse) down stream, I can't help but think you > have little or no interest in understanding the problem, offering > any useful comments about it, or trying to write a program to > solve the problem. Apparently the only interest you do have is > making captious remarks.
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-30 01:00 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-29 23:25 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-30 14:04 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-12-31 00:24 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-31 06:42 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2022-12-31 17:04 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-01 01:24 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-01-08 07:45 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-08 17:17 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-08 20:41 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2023-01-08 21:14 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-08 22:31 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-09 03:25 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-09 11:22 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-09 20:37 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-10 09:06 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-11 02:41 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2023-01-11 10:01 +0100
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-12 01:00 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-01-10 23:36 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Y A <ya00000100000@yahoo.com> - 2023-01-11 02:39 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-01 01:10 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-01-08 07:17 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-08 19:43 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-01-08 19:59 +0000
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-01-10 23:25 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-12-31 06:20 -0800
Re: Another little puzzle Augǝl <angel0000000001000000000000@mail.ee> - 2022-12-31 10:23 -0800
csiph-web