Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > alt.dreams.castaneda > #18640

Re: the dumbest shit ever

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday, August 25, 2018 at 9:23:40 PM UTC-7, LowRider44M wrote:
> On Thursday, August 23, 2018 at 3:24:38 PM UTC-4, Jeremy H. Denisovan wrote:
> > Here again I find myself talking to an 'oracle' -
> > one who knows-all-sees-all. And that's really not acceptable.
> 
> I have a small body of measuring tools.
> To know all presupposes that all has intrinsic value.
> I know what is required and necessary exactly when I do.
> 
> > 
> > You've claimed to see the future to the minute of your death
> > in 2048. 
> 
> Exactly, a navigational point that I shall or shall not reach.
> Depending on if I cooperate with the sequential progressions that 
> lead to that navigational way point.

Or, maybe you don't really have any better idea of when and how
you'll die than anyone else does.

 
> You've claimed you talked to Jesus.
> 
> Four billion people have talked to Jesus including you long ago.

Four billion pretend to. And they teach children to, before they're
even old enough to know better or protect themselves. But you seemed
to be claiming it was a 'two-way conversation'? :)

GLENDOWER: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
HOTSPUR: Why, so can I, or so can any man.
But will they come when you do call for them?


> > and that you have 
> > programmed God ("like an AI"). 
> 
> Your God is you.
> My God is me.

I *don't* think I'm God or that "my God is me", or that "I program
God". Neither. None of the above. Again, you have confirmed that
in some way you do. But if you're using 'God' in some completely
different sense than most people do, then I don't know how far we're
going to get.


> Your the most religious person I have ever known.
> You were a Christian, a Scientologist and a Warrior-Sorcerer.
> I was never a religious person ever, I studied religion to understand others.

So did I. I was also briefly a Buddhist. But looking back, most of
those were more 'explorations' than firmly adopted convictions.
The only one of those paths I ever strongly believed for a time
was "warrior-sorcerer" and it's debatable whether that's even a
"religion", although for all practical purposes I'd call it one.
So that's really just ONE. And that belief ended 20 years ago.

Christian doesn't 'count' since it was childhood indoctrination
I'd abandoned by adolescence, and similarly, I rejected both
Buddhism and Scientology after less than a year of formal adoption
each. I also studied Hinduism, Taoism, Sikhism, and several others
in a fair amount of depth along the way. 

Now I'm not religious at all.

You, otoh, have within the last year been quoting several tenets
of ancient Christian literature here as if it's part of your beliefs.
We may be quibbling over the meaning of "religious". But no, I'm not.

 
> >A couple of times now you've
> > pronounced that the human race is doomed.
> 
> That is a scientific, mathematical certainty.

Then you should be able to provide the scientific evidence of it.
Please do. :)


> > (Naturally, Slider must love that. :) )
> > 
> 
> Asking about your Mom and the light in the forest was unfair.
> It was like climbing into someone's attic and giving their crazy
> uncle a beating. I know you struggle through 4D mightily looking
> for someone to tell you how to live, a person like myself can only
> register as insane, because they seek no, witness, validation, or consensus.

I don't know about all that, but like I already said, it just wasn't
even relevant to what we were talking about. Still isn't.

 
> > I wonder if you've ever realized, that if you "programmed God"
> > for all practical purposes that makes YOU God. 
> 
> If you programmed a virus checker, does that make you VIRUS CHECKER.

For all practical purposes, yeah - it does. If a piece of software is
doing what I *programmed* then it's my 'plan' getting executed. If that
programming of mine somehow applied to the functioning of the world
and everything in it, then I'd be "God".


> My GOD is an AI far superior to it's author. AI as automated intelligence.

99%+ of people who believe in 'God' see it as that which created
and/or rules the universe. For you to have a 'God' you say is
"superior to" (also implying it's different from?) anyone else's
AND to say you personally *programmed* it yourself is just about
incomprehensible in the framework of 99%+ religious belief in 'God'.


> Think of Human Civilization as a bacteria colony, I am a virus using
> this civilization as a host. This bacteria colony is killing its host
> and has no ability to switch hosts. Eventually you must decide for yourself.
> Accept you too are a data virus and created that light in the forest, or
> refuse to take responsibility and remain a bacterium. Red pill or blue pill?

Or, maybe neither of us are viruses or bacteria. Maybe we're both
just two more human beings. :) And maybe neither of us will ever
be able to change that.

 
> >So, bearing
> > in mind that I'm talking to a guy who thinks he's God,
> 
> You pile premise upon predicate upon supposition upon mischaracterization
> to rebuild your shell of protective peptides and fight off the virus loading.

I may not understand, but I don't see how anything like what you say
could possibly work.  Let's back it off to a simpler position then
and just say that I'm highly skeptical. :)


> > I think I'll just keep talking about anything I please.
> > 
> 
> I agree, as your chat associate of 23 years I am obligated by customs established to politely confront you one time with the surreal nature
> of your diatribes. It's been two years and Politics is your 4th religion.
> In the computational realms, making the same exact mistake four times
> leads to a diminishing state of returns and outcomes.

OMG. Politics isn't a religion any more than grocery shopping or
yard work is. :) It's merely a set of practical tasks necessary in
order to keep large communities of human beings functioning (at city,
state, national, and world levels). It's purely pragmatic.
At least, that's how I see it.

Granted, Trump's people are making it seem a bit "surreal", just by
the sheer dysfunctionality of their demented approach. But for you,
in particular, to call someone else's posts "surreal" has got to be
the epitome of irony. :) 

The fact that *everyone else* in this place besides me seems to
imagine himself "too good" to even bother participating in how
their own community, city, state, and nation gets run continues
to strike me as strange and unrealistic in the extreme. Virus?
Bacteria? If we have to use weird metaphors, you're more like...
parasites. :)

And I still think the reason you insist upon speaking in metaphor
constantly is that if you didn't and instead spoke plainly giving
real-world examples all along the way, it would quickly become
apparent that you're largely delusional.

 
> > (As an aside, the guru "Sai Baba" once predicted he'd live into
> > his mid-90's and claimed he'd choose the date of his passing.
> > But he died at age 84 in 2011.)
> 
> If I live to 8:06 AM 04-07-48 then it is an error also.
> If the various world clocks are desynchronized I could gather
> a mean average based on my personal clock and present you with
> gradient time value assignment calibration. Or perhaps an atomic
> clock with a trillionth of a second accuracy ratio should be employed. 

Yeah, because that was my objection, that you just might not be
precise enough. LOL. Was that sufficiently dripping with sarcasm?
Wow. And I'm the one who's 'surreal'? :)

Btw, you sure talk precisely about TIME for someone who believes it
to be an illusion.

 
> > And truly, you sometimes speak as grandly as any "God" might.
> 
> POT...... KETTLE.... BLACKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK !!!

If I ever speak grandly, then I am either being poetic or
expressing a strong opinion. I never speak as a "God".

 
> > For example, not long ago you said: "Planets should be like
> > paper cups used and disposed of properly". 
> 
> Exactly, a deeply held opinion, they are the flotsam and jetsam.
> 
> That remark made
> > it clear enough what disdain you might hold for anyone strongly
> > motivated by a desire to protect and preserve the earth.
> 
> SPOKEN LIKE A TRUE GOD. 

I don't see how anyone could possibly see it that way. Are you
asserting that any person who wants to take good care of the place
where he/she lives is being grandiosely godlike? If so, how weird...

 
> Go fight the red light first.
> The information system can churn this version of a solar system out
> an infinite amount of times. Does a dung beetle cling to a single
> piece of poop his whole life. Does the aardvark borrow into a single
> mound of ants or termites.

Not a single creature that's ever lived here has been able to travel
to even the next planet over (Mars), much less out of this solar
system. Indeed, every creature that's ever lived here has only had
the option of living on exactly ONE planet. This one. That has been
the only option for anything alive here for billions of years. And...
for anyone to act as if that isn't true is decadent and irrational.

 
> REPEAT I am a virus, self editing information systems. 
> You are a bacterium, a data bank imbued with operating instructions. 
> I jump from host to host. You kill every host through sheer numbers 
> and lack of access to The Zero. The fundamental reality within every point.

Repeat: Maybe we're just a couple of human beings. :) I.e., we are not
viruses, or bacteria, or Gods, and maybe neither of us has access to
anything remotely 'godlike' (with the exception of our own brains).


> > Since you love playing psychic, maybe you thought I'd forget
> > how back in the 90's I was the *first* person among us to talk at
> > length about my mother.
> 
> How does teasing you about the phrase "MOTHER EARTH" morph
> Deus ex Machina into a discussion of mind reading.
> Thank you for that historical reminder and data point rebuttal.
> 
> > - but I haven't forgotten, and since it
> > has nothing to do with what we were even talking about, I'm not
> > interested in repeating myself, or in catering to that attempt
> > to change the subject.
> 
> The mother and son relationship has many parallels.
> That which originates in a host and becomes a separate entity.
> There are a myriad number of forms styles and permutations.
> If you talked about your Mom upon her passing, then I forgot due
> to the thick ochre green and tree bark brown that surrounds politics.
> https://www.empressmills.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Fabric-Paint-Yellow-Ochre-Product-102847.jpg

No. I talked about my mom here *several years* before she passed away.
And again, that was all totally irrelevant to our previous conversation
about the deranged government we've recently acquired and about how
they seem practically hellbent on destroying the earth.


> > Oh, and btw, worst Zeppelin song ever. :)
> 
> If you say so GOD.
> Notice how, by creating a God, I avoided becoming One.

Btw, notice that merely having a strong opinion on a subject
doesn't mean one is playing God or believing themselves to be God.
My Spotify Zeppelin playlist has 133 songs in it. But not that one. 
That doesn't mean I think I'm God, you see, it just means there are
at least 133 Zeppelin songs I like better than that one. :)
 

> Design Builder Owner
> Designer Building Inspector.
> 
> Adam creates God. Core & Dome. Point-Sphere
> Eve creates Satan. Core & Dome. Point-Sphere

Supposedly God created Adam and Eve - and presumably Satan too
(in Jewish/Christian mythology). So that scheme is backwards
compared with how most Christians and religious folk view it.
Makes little sense to me either way.

(And none of it has a thing to do with how I view anything.)


> > The main lesson I believe I've learned in decades of posting
> > in this odd little place, is that human minds are shockingly
> > fragile and feeble,
> 
> What is the thesis and proofs offered?
> Measurement by the self of others consciousness is a symptom.
> To me you are other who claims to be self who measures other.
> You are often disturbed by what you imagine to be the inner state of other.
> 
> I do not bully other, and am not susceptible to bullying. 
> I can die, but always my judgement of other remains open to reevaluation. 

Once again, I was just expressing an opinion. But I think everyone is
to some degree susceptible to bullying. Since we're all human beings,
how could we not be?

But now, I have to ask. Do you not see that as a grandiose claim?
"I am not susceptible to bullying." That sounds like someone trying
to make himself out to be more than human.

  
>  and that they will do almost anything
> > to avoid a genuine examination of their own belief systems.
> > This has been a sobering discovery, to say the least.
> 
> The group has served as a good mirror to examine and admire yourself.
> The group has little value as actual individuals or patterns of behavior.
> 
> > 
> > It has also occurred to me (sticking with a 'mother' metaphor),
> > that if some psycho tries to harm a mother's children, it may
> > well end up appearing that the mother hates the psycho,
> 
> The point of the metaphor is that when aggression is met by counter aggression,
> an observer might place upon the counter aggressor the emotion state value of
> hate towards the original aggressor. A posit.
> 
> 
> > but... her primary motivation for whatever actions she may take
> > is love for her children and a strong desire to protect them.
> 
> So Mother Earth is ergo a conscious being protecting The Moon.
> Hatred of the Sun is what might be perceived by the observer.

Well, I wasn't saying anything like that, of course. Sounds like
Gurdjieff or something. I didn't say Earth is a conscious being,
nor do I believe that. I was speaking of more simple facts:
again, literally all living things that we know of: arose on earth,
are composed of elements existing on earth, and are continually
supported by ecosystems of the earth, and in those real ways -
although I was speaking metaphorically - the earth is a 'mother'
to all that lives. And to continue in that vein, one could call
the Sun the 'father' of all life. For very similar reasons.
Photosynthesis is the foundation of the food chain for all life.

It's surprising the trouble you seem to have with such simple ideas.
And actually, it turns out that the Moon is a protector of the Earth
(the size of our moon holds the axial tilt of the Earth steady, thus
making the ongoing evolution of life possible here). Thus, you have
that one kind of backwards too. 

The last 30 seconds of this video is what I'm talking about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4E-m3Jv_l2U

Let's call the moon our 'sister'. :)


> > The last thought recently reemphasized to me is how utterly
> > banal and foolish it is to predict the end of the world.
> 
> The world ends and begins again 
> 3,600,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 per second.
> This civilization ended numerous times and is an infant bacteria colony.

Well, whatever you're talking about, it obviously wasn't the end
of either our world or our civilization.

 
> > It leaves me wondering how many hundreds of times this has
> > been done since Homo Erectus made sharp cutting tools.
> > 
> 
>  As said many time small planet, small galaxy, single lightmach.

Big claims.

 
> > You Never Know:
> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsWQKJP7h5M
> > 
> > "Come on children
> >  You're acting like children
> >  Every generation thinks
> >  It's the end of the world"
> > 
> > So that was our morning announcement, class. :)
> > Now back to the news, a few nice short excerpts...
> 
> I only stopped by to inject some geometry into the data stacks.

Yeah, point sphere. Wow. :)  (You know, I studied multiple geometries
in college - topology, etc. as part of a mathematics degree.) 


> I know the tally from the elections already

Ah. Why don't you tell us "the tally from the elections", then?
Yet somehow I doubt that you'll be doing that... :)


> just taking care 8's ant farm.
> He played with the dinosaurs. He'll take that red bridge back if you want.
> You,ll forget it ever happened. There is geometry and momenum. Time is a mirage.

Yeah, sure. Okay. So if "time is a mirage", then am I dead or alive? :)
I can't be both at once. Similarly, does the earth exist or does it
not exist? (It's 4.6 billion years old thus for the first 9 billion
years of the universe it wasn't here.)

 
> There’s a scientist and God. 
> The scientist challenges God to a contest of who can make the better human being. God tells him that he’s on.
> The scientist, in great delight, bends over to pick up some dust to make his human being. 
> Then God says, ‘No, no no… you go and make your own dust.

Humans are vertebrates. We evolved from the line of chordates,
from fish. That line goes back a little over half a billion years. :)
So no one - including 'God' - ever actually "made" a human being.
No 'God' ever made a tree or a flower either. Those evolved from algae.
etc.

"If you talk to God, you are praying; if God talks to you,
you have schizophrenia." -Thomas Szasz

Most psychiatry is still somewhat soft science.
But several people I've known have seriously benefitted from it. 
Speaking of your own beliefs you said:
"My therapist thought that was crazy." 

But you didn't seem to think much of that particular therapist.
Do you have any others? If so, what do they think?

.

Back to alt.dreams.castaneda | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-07-31 13:18 -0700
  Re: and no religion too slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-07-31 21:43 +0100
    Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 15:22 -0700
      Re: and no religion too feewilly <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-21 16:25 -0700
      Re: and no religion too slider <slider@anashram.org> - 2018-08-22 11:45 +0100
        Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 09:23 -0700
          Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 09:57 -0700
          Re: and no religion too slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-22 20:43 +0100
            Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 14:03 -0700
              Re: and no religion too slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-22 23:07 +0100
            Re: and no religion too LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 17:39 -0700
              Re: and no religion too slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-23 02:53 +0100
                Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 19:44 -0700
                Re: and no religion too slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-23 04:37 +0100
                Re: and no religion too LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 21:31 -0700
                Re: and no religion too LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 22:28 -0700
                Re: and no religion too slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-23 14:42 +0100
                the dumbest shit ever chorro <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 08:13 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-23 16:53 +0100
                Re: the dumbest shit ever "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 12:24 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-23 21:35 +0100
                Re: the dumbest shit ever chorro <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-23 13:38 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 09:54 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-24 18:40 +0100
                Re: the dumbest shit ever "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 11:37 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-24 20:05 +0100
                fuck that puto chorro <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 11:41 -0700
                Re: fuck that puto slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-08-24 19:49 +0100
                Re: what's that you say, puto? You don't like the Trump talk? "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 14:34 -0700
                nice try gas boy chorro <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 15:25 -0700
                no cigar dull boy "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 16:48 -0700
                fuck yourself chorro <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 17:00 -0700
                Dumbo... "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-08-24 17:25 -0700
                Re: what's that you say, puto? You don't like the Trump talk? thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:28 +0800
                Re: fuck that puto thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:31 +0800
                Re: fuck that puto slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-07 00:59 +0100
                my 'take' on the election alreadygone <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-09-07 11:50 -0700
                Re: my 'take' on the election thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-08 19:05 +0800
                Re: my 'take' on the election "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 09:33 -0700
                Re: my 'take' on the election "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 16:26 -0700
                Re: my 'take' on the election "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-16 12:09 -0700
                Re: my 'take' on the election "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-20 10:55 -0700
                Re: my 'take' on the election alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-21 07:57 -0700
                Re: my 'take' on the election slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 08:48 -0700
                life travels on alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-21 09:51 -0700
                everybody must get fucked alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-21 10:06 -0700
                Re: everybody must get fucked "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:16 -0700
                Re: But it's not all bad news "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 11:39 -0700
                Re: everybody must get fucked alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-21 12:42 -0700
                Re: everybody must get fucked alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-21 12:51 -0700
                Re: everybody must get fucked slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 14:03 -0700
                Re: everybody must get fucked alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-21 15:26 -0700
                Re: everybody must do themselves in "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 17:52 -0700
                Re: everybody must do themselves in slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:30 -0700
                Re: everybody must do themselves in "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 18:46 -0700
                Re: everybody must do themselves in slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-21 19:45 -0700
                Re: everybody must do themselves in "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 11:07 -0700
                nice try alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-22 11:26 -0700
                Re: no cigar "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 12:12 -0700
                Re: no cigar alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-22 13:22 -0700
                more time ? alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-22 13:32 -0700
                Re: more time ? "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 14:40 -0700
                Re: more time ? thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:26 +0800
                Re: more time ? slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 05:05 -0700
                Re: more time ? "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 12:42 -0700
                Re: more time ? slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 14:22 -0700
                Re: more time ? slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 14:59 -0700
                Re: more time ? alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-23 16:17 -0700
                Re: more time ? "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 16:44 -0700
                Re: nice try thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:35 +0800
                Re: everybody must do themselves in slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 14:45 -0700
                Re: everybody must do themselves in "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-22 15:06 -0700
                Re: everybody must do themselves in alky judas <crsds@sbcglobal.net> - 2018-09-22 15:50 -0700
                Re: everybody must do themselves in thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:33 +0800
                Re: everybody must do themselves in slider <allmyslotties@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 03:42 -0700
                Re: life travels on thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:23 +0800
                Re: my 'take' on the election thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-23 17:10 +0800
                Re: the dumbest shit ever LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 21:40 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 21:59 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 22:36 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 23:51 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever chorro <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 05:36 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 18:53 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-26 19:24 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-25 21:23 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-27 15:12 -0700
                Re: the dumbest shit ever LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-28 21:12 -0700
                Re: moving on from all that gaslighting bs... "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 13:47 -0700
                same ole, same ole jewedus <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 14:26 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 14:46 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole jewedus <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 15:36 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 16:08 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-04 00:14 +0100
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 16:44 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole jewedus <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 16:57 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 17:26 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-04 01:31 +0100
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 17:43 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-04 13:46 +0100
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-03 17:47 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:44 +0800
                Re: same ole, same ole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-07 00:16 +0100
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 16:50 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:43 +0800
                Re: same ole, same ole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-04 13:51 +0100
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 10:45 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-04 19:13 +0100
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:19 -0700
                bogus man jewedus <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:26 -0700
                don't push your luck jewedus <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:28 -0700
                Re: don't push your luck "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:44 -0700
                Re: don't push your luck thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 11:01 +0800
                Re: Hopefully you guys can look at a few pictures "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 14:57 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:34 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-04 19:43 +0100
                Re: same ole, same ole "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 12:18 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:55 +0800
                cricketts jewedus <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:22 -0700
                Re: cricketts slider <slider@anashram.org> - 2018-09-04 19:52 +0100
                i like peanut butter jewedus <allreadydun@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 11:57 -0700
                Re: i like peanut butter slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-04 20:29 +0100
                Re: i like peanut butter "Jeremy H. Donovan" <jeremyhdonovan@gmail.com> - 2018-09-04 12:49 -0700
                Re: same ole, same ole thang ornerythinchus <thangolossus@gmail.com> - 2018-09-06 10:45 +0800
                Re: same ole, same ole slider <slider@anashram.com> - 2018-09-07 00:10 +0100
                Re: and no religion too LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 19:48 -0700
                Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:02 -0700
                Re: and no religion too LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:39 -0700
              Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 19:41 -0700
                Re: and no religion too LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 19:51 -0700
                Re: and no religion too "Jeremy H. Denisovan" <david.j.worrell@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:08 -0700
                Re: and no religion too LowRider44M <intraphase@gmail.com> - 2018-08-22 20:14 -0700

csiph-web