Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #32428
| From | Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| References | <201106091849.p59InKR27158@smtp.cobalt.loc> <isravp$b8l$3@inf2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> <isreob$6io$3@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <81sfc8-583.ln1@spankydtr.localhost.net> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-06-12 15:43 -0700 |
On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:40:15 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > Chris wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties: > >> Am Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:17 +0200 schrieb KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE: >> >>> LIE >> >>> LIEnucks kernel panic. Only happens 3 times per day on LiEnucks fail >>> boxes. LOL. >> >> So I must be a wizard? >> >> chris@chrisl ~ % ssh server.local uptime >> 22:20:19 up 2 days, 2:11, 0 users, load average: 0.13, 0.14, 0.22 >> chris@chrisl ~ % uptime >> 22:28:38 up 3 days, 12:43, 4 users, load average: 0.05, 0.03, 0.15 > > 17:38:28 up 179 days, 4:00, 2 users, load average: 0.18, 0.04, 0.01 > > 64-bit Debian. smtp server, up 359 days, handling up to some 10,000 emails per minute. The back end (mailstore) handles considerably more emails (it gets fed from multiple front-end mailers) and is even more robust. The pop/imap/ web mailer needs somewhat more maintenance and fiddling (mostly featuritis), so it's only been up 267 days. Note, however, that the 359 days is "per server", rather than "per service"; the last time we had an actual email service outage due to system failure was about 3 years ago when we had a lengthy power outage and the generator failed (couldn't deliver power "clean" enough for the UPS to pass it.) The media server/myth box in the living room runs until the hardware needs twiddling or we blow a breaker; uptimes of six months are trivially accomplished, despite its recording, playback, use as internal file, web and DB server and a few other tasks loaded on for good measure. Linux? It's about as close to "set it and forget it" as an OS can be. :)
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-09 20:49 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-09 20:38 +0000
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-09 17:40 -0400
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 16:58 -0500
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-09 18:50 -0400
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget III <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 19:50 -0500
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-09 21:11 -0400
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:02 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-10 08:23 +0000
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:50 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:18 -0400
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2011-06-10 06:08 -0400
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-10 07:26 -0500
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:08 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 07:40 -0500
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2011-06-10 13:46 +0100
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "Clogwog" <clogwog@anon.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:09 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Sinister Midget <fardblossom@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 10:38 -0500
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 09:33 -0400
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:51 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:50 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Clog_-_wog (®) <clog_-_wog@anonimous.eu> - 2011-06-10 17:19 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2011-06-10 11:44 -0400
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:20 -0400
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-10 17:06 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 15:43 -0700
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! bbgruff <bbgruff@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-06-09 23:49 +0100
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! "KUTLOZE SCHEEFGEPOEPTE" <KUTLOZE@evil.fucker.com> - 2011-06-10 17:17 +0200
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! Chris <chrisdhaag@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-10 15:52 +0000
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-10 11:52 -0500
Re: More solid proof that LIEnucks just sucks! flatfish+++ <flatfish@marianatrench.com> - 2011-06-10 12:54 -0400
Re: More solid proof that "chrisv" is a useless piece of shit. "Hannibal Pointdexter" <run@invalid.com> - 2011-06-10 12:56 -0400
csiph-web